data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1d09/b1d09c370945cc4eff20ff79a58bd8f6924d7fdb" alt="post photo preview"
***Unedited...Typos, Warts, and All (Taking a day off with my daughter.)***
Day 30 of Oath Keepers Trial - Nov 18
Good morning. It ain't over yet . . . but we're in the home stretch of the first Oath Keepers trial. Closing arguments begin today. AUSA Rakoczy will give the government's close, then I think Lee Bright will go for Stewart Rhodes, and then Stanley Woodward for Kelly Meggs . . .
I think that's all we will get through today. Complete the last three defendant's closes on Monday . . . and then it goes to the jury.
——
Mehta takes the bench at 9:01am . . . Jury seated at 9:04am
AUSA Rakoczy immediately begins the government’s summation with a lie. She quoted Stewart Rhodes: “We are not getting through this without a civil war. Prepare your mind body & spirit.” That IS what he said . . . but she then followed it by saying he “called” for war. (Not exactly what he said.)
The hyperbolic exaggeration of her assertions are every bit as egregious as the inflammatory talk between some of the OK chats. The difference is, they never actually used their weapons on anyone. Everyone of these defendants have had the government’s guns trained on them.
——
I’m not going to even try and keep up with anything close to a narrative. I’ll drop commentary on whatever seems significant.
Rakoczy flat out lied about Harrelson’s lack of messages in Signal chats - saying it was because he deleted everything. The problem with that is, They captured everyone else’s phones and Signal chats. They would have had everything he said from other sources. They know they had nothing on him in terms of all that ‘scary’ language they had on everyone else, so they just posted a photoshopped “deleted” chat bubble, and claimed they didn’t have anything on him because he deleted it all.
(They also pulled a really dirty trick on Harrelson’s lawyer last night. Pure evil. Can’t share now, you can bet I will as soon as cleared to do so.)
——
I had chats with three of four of the defense attorneys this morning. I’ll not break confidence about what they are thinking, what they feel, what they think is coming their clients’ way once this is handed to the jury. One thing is for certain . . . this “justice” department is not looking for justice. They are looking for scalps, and are willing to stretch any words to the to the extreme.
Scary words vs. Scary deeds is the crux of this trial. Hundreds, and in some case Thousands of protestors actually preceded the OKs in reaching the Capitol, yet Rakoczy furthered the myth that they were the “Leaders” of the assault on the Capitol.
Not one OK ever breached a permitter barricade of the Capitol. Literally thousands of people had passed through those areas before they ever arrived. But, they were the ”leaders.”
——
Rakoczy even opened with the exaggeration of how these LEADERS armed up for their assault on DC “from the four corners of our nation.” But, when she put up the map of where the conspirators came from: AZ, TX, OH VA, NC, FL
Rakoczy just showed SUPER scary photos of OKs taking target practice with . . . wait for it . . . silhouettes of “humans” on them. (I’m going to guess she’s been to a shooting range before . . . and that most of this DC jury never has. Play to their ignorance, fears and feelings.)
——
File this one under SYCMU: Rakoczy showed three hotel rooms booked closely together at the VA Comfort Inn - for the AZ, NC, and FL QRFs, saying, “The level of planning for this shows the conspiracy.” (I mean, seriously, the level of planning required to book three hotel rooms next to one other is simply beyond the grasp of anyone short of a Field Marshal’s IQ.)
——
Seriously though . . . there was bad sh-t that happened on J6, and some of these people said and did stupid things, but . . . “seditious conspiracy” level stuff? Most certainly not. Not as compared to others who actually violently assaulted law enforcement officers - who have already been convicted and sentenced to 2, 5, 7, 10 years. But this triple-conspiracy circus is solely political in nature. Scapegoat BBQ. I mean . . . come on. Hearing Rakoczy describing their level of “coordination” to “halt the certification” is hilarious. They’d of needed a Time Machine and a Star Trek-like transporter to have accomplished anything close to the exaggerated claims being made by Rakoczy in this closing argument.
——
It’s those smaller lies they [government lawyers] tell that makes everything else they contend fair game to call into question. Charging defendants with damage and destruction to doors that were first opened before they ever arrived - then opened again with 75-100 people passing through before they reached those doors. Doors that were being broken and panes shattered before the OKs arrived . . . doors opened from the INSIDE . . . doors no OK touched, pushed upon, or pulled . . . by irrefutable video evidence. This was the first lie I saw in Harrelson’s earliest charging docs, before the superseding indictment of seditious conspiracy. The affiant FBI agent actually accused him of damaging the door and assaulting officers, and attached a YouTube link that showed the exact opposite. That’s what first drew me to his case. I could SEE the lie, and the carelessness of the investigator’s report. (Carelessness, or indifference to the truth?) That was right at a year ago, and here I now sit, at Harrelson’s and the other OKs’ trial.
——
Rakoczy concludes at 11:19am, and Lee Bright immediately begins his closing argument for Stewart Rhodes. He begins by saying his argument will only be for Rhodes, “Because they are all different.”
——
Bright is essentially taking the jury through the exaggerations and “fallacious” characterizations of OKs history, all the way through to J6.
The Big Three questions he asked of every FBI witness anthems trial, and they ALL agreed. There was:
-No plan to storm the Capitol
-No plan to breach the Rotunda
-No plan to stop or delay the certification of the election
But, I guarantee that if you only got your news from the MSM, you wouldn’t have heard those Big Three questions Bright asked of every FBI agent during cross examination.
——
One of the most powerful aspects of Rakoczy’s government closing presentation is the relentless use of multi-media to put in front of the jury, backing up every word with images, videos, or transcripts. By contrast, these defense teams do not have the millions of dollars - really, limitless resources to produce the same razzle-dazzle to counter the psyop advantage given the DOJ. (Some of these defense lawyers are working for free, BTW.)
One of the most important reforms that can be made to correct the injustices in our justice system, would be a law requiring the federal government to allocate and fund dollar-for-dollor matching funds to ANY and EVERY citizen they bring charges against. If the feds spend a million bucks prosecuting a citizen, that citizen’s legal defense fund must be matched by the government itself. (I bet I could get the lawyer lobby on board with that idea.)
——
Bright gave a brilliant argument about Rhodes’ legal right to argue and advocate for the then sitting president to invoke the Insurrection Act. Not that he or anyone else has to agree with Rhodes’ interpretation of how, when, and if it should be used. The bottomline, as an American citizen he has the right to advocate and write open letters to the president about any legal doctrine.
More importantly, Rhodes’ desire to act upon the Insurrection Act was ALWAYS conditional upon Trump invoking the act. As SUCH . . . there was never one shred of evidence about a ‘meeting of the minds’ for a conspiracy to:
-storm the Capitol
-breach the Rotunda
-stop or delay the certification of the election
….as testified to by every FBI witness in this trial.
——
Graydon Young . . . the 28th government witness later . . . and the government finally came up with the idea of an IMPLICIT conspiracy. Why, because all those witnesses before couldn’t produce evidence of an EXPLICIT conspiracy. Therefore, the government switches gears, and comes up with the frightening specter of “implicit” seditious conspiracy.
(This trial was already about Scary words vs. Scary deeds, but this DOJ wants to turn all of us into seditionists who express frustrations with our government. Scary thoughts. Thought crimes. Implicit conspiracies.)
——
Mehta calls for lunch break at 12:35pm . . .
We could possibly get in two more closing statements today. Woodward for Meggs, and Geyer for Harrelson.
Metha returns to bench at 1:37pm
——
Jury reseated, and Woodward immediately begins close for Kelly Meggs.
Not one time during governments close did they mention the word “security.” The provision of security at the rally was the REASON for OKs presence in DC. There was no plan to go into the Capitol or stop the election confirmation, and the government failed to provide a single piece of evidence to meet their charges about stopping that confirmation.
Woodward again brings up the government’s change in their theory of a plan for months, into something last minute that the OKs took advantage of.
Replaying quick clips of Louisville, KY video of OKs being harassed by protestors while keeping their calm - yet, they were there because their presence had been requested by local businesses who couldn’t afford private security during the riots following Breonna Taylor killing. Photo shown of OKs providing security for Roger Stone. (Obviously, these are security ops in which Meggs participated.)
Woodward continues to build on the concept of OKs providing security at events - because the government left out all mention of that as their primary mission.
Finally . . . someone brings up the long-ago government witness, Abdullah Rasheed - the convicted child molester and serial name-changer, who secretly taped a conference call, calling his reliability into question. Not to mention, the call he recorded had nothing to do with J6.
——
Continues to go through examples of OK ops attended by Meggs. Finally getting up to J6.
Brings up when the FBI agent admitted that she didn’t skip through al the “security op” messages, that it was the GOVERNMENT who selectively pulled and only showed the court those “scary words.” Begins showing many of those messages on J6 that the government deliberately skipped and showed out of sequence, and out of context. (As mentioned earlier today . . . it’s very easy to prove from this trial that our DOJ has no interest in JUSTICE. Only scalps. Trophies. Notches in their gun belts. Credits toward promotions by making the OKs the scapegoats of J6.)
Woodward takes the jury the the actual planning of the day on J6, including the staging permits issued by the Capitol Police, and their USCP’s OWN published document that they were expecting multiple events all day and into the evening, with congresspersons and senators and other VIPs in attendance. AND with the OKs being the ones providing security at the stage and safe escort to and from rally site, Capitol stage area, back to cars and hotels.
——
No FBI agent could provide a single written chat or plan for storming the Capitol or stopping the certification, but plenty of actual plans, permits and paper trails on security operations.
Begins showing unedited videos of Meggs and other OKs when they entered Capitol. No damage to property. No damage to doors. Taking selfies in Rotunda. Shows that the time which Special Agent Lazarus says he saw Meggs and OKs interacting with Ofc Dunn NEVER happened. Don’t know why they lied. But they did. Video proves Lazarus came into that area long after Meggs and OKs were gone.
Video as Meggs and OKs left in less than 20 minutes after entering. Peacefully, and with no damage to property. (Something the government kinda-sorta conveniently didn’t show during their presentations of the ‘facts.’)
——
Woodward produced summation of Capitol Police memo in which they were aware there’d by a significant number of protestors and possible rioters on J6. The question remains, is why they didn’t have adequate staffing the for the day.
Woodward begins reviewing the long list of FBI Special Agents . . . and how NONE of them ever harvested a single message, comm, call, or anything else calling for the OKs to attack the Capitol or stop the certification of the vote.
Then goes through each of the charges against Meggs, instructions for each, and then asks for a not guilty verdict on all charges.
Mehta decides to end the day early . . . and dismisses jury at 3:13pm.