Steve Baker - TPC
News • Politics • Writing
Steve's Tweetstorm From Day 18 of Oath Keepers Trial
Government Puts Caldwell in the Cauldron Today
November 01, 2022
post photo preview
Thomas Caldwell at Capitol (from trial exhibit photo)

Day 18 of Oath Keepers Trial - Nov 1

 

Mehta takes the bench at 9:19am . . . addresses objections regarding exhibits.

 

Fischer comes forward to discuss the stolen riot shield that is to be presented, implicating Caldwell as being “complicit” in that event. Fischer has presented a video, previously, which shows by timestamp, Caldwell and his wife having already left the area before that episode happened. Nestler shows the Court they have video on Caldwell actually saying, “We stole the cop’s riot shield.” Fischer returns to discuss the use of the word “we.” (I suppose it depends on the definition of “we.” BTW . . . did we ever get a clear definition of what the meaning of “is” is?) Mehta is going to allow a photo of the shield, but not the video of what was happening inside the west tunnel battle. (No OKs were involved in that battle.) Mehta admits the use of that video is prejudicial. (He could have fairly and consistently made that ruling 100 other times in this trial.) There is another video Fischer objects to, which the government intends to present, showing a synched video of Caldwell’s arrival to the west side of the Capitol as certain violence was beginning.

 

***Side note: I actually bumped into Mr. Caldwell this morning as we were going through security screening. He asked me if I had seen the whole trial. (Indeed, I have.) He then asked me, “How did this whole thing suddenly become about me? I’m not even an Oath Keeper, wasn’t with the other guys that day, and didn’t go inside the building?” (I didn’t offer an answer.)

 

Fischer has additional objections to certain Facebook messages to be presented today. They are going through those, but we can’t see them until they are actually cleared by Mehta to be introduced into evidence. As is typical, Mehta gave Fischer his one small bone today, but the rest is mostly going the government’s way.

 

——

 

Mehta is getting a bit impatient, ready to get the jury seated, and asked if they can address more of the objections during lunch. (Yes.) Juli Haller also came forward to object to another message by Mrs. Meggs. This particular time Mehta repeated a previous line, “You can’t unring the bell of what your clients have previously said.” 

 

More comments from Rhode’s team, from back of room and off mic . . . <inaudible> . . . We didn’t hear, but Mehta responds that it’s not an argument for inadmissibility. Nestler argues against that which we didn’t hear. 

 

Now Crisp comes forward to support previous arguments against certain videos. 

 

Jury finally seated at 9:53am . . . 

 

——

 

Government calls FBI Special Agent Kelsey Harris - returning to stand. (Appearing in place of Agent Whitney Drew who had scheduling conflict.)

 

AUSA Nestler shows photo of Harrelson exiting east doors of Capitol. Another photo of Harrelson being spoken to by Meggs on Capitol steps. (He didn’t go anywhere with those photos, but the 2nd one was really cool. I’ve not seen that one before.)

 

Nestler now shifts to Facebook messages taken from Thomas Caldwell’s account in which various brazen rah-rah chats are taking place on the day of J6.

 

Nestler is literally just reading these inflammatory FB messages to the court. Agent Harris just sitting there listening, until an actual Caldwell response comes up, then Harris reads Caldwell’s specific messages. Most of these messages TO Caldwell are coming from OKs not at the Capitol. Almost all of the messages FROM Caldwell are those braggadocios “WE did this sh-t” kind of messages, which of course Caldwell and his wife aren’t actually physically capable of doing. They obviously watched. Obviously cheered it on. Obviously were exuberant about what they were seeing. But in all his responses back to the OKs at home on their sofas, Caldwell was taking credit for being IN the battle . . . even though he wasn’t. (Probably wanted to be, but his age and health would no longer allow that.)

 

We’re now seeing videos of the west side of Capitol crowd and battle scenes. Caldwell is shown in one still photo, exuberantly waving an arm. Now they are showing that photo of the west tunnel scene (which Mehta earlier approved) showing a riot shield taken from officers. The government is making the insinuation that Caldwell somehow directed the stealing of that riot shield from his position far back in the crowd to the rioters inside the tunnel. (Seriously. I’m not kidding.)

 

<sidebar called by Mehta>

 

——

 

Long sidebar concludes with Nestler shifting back to more Facebook messages. Literal and figurative messages from OKs expressing their desire for bombs, bullets, gas, etc. to take out the Capitol and all its occupants . . . from guys at home sitting on their sofas watching the event on TV. Those guys are obviously more informed about what’s happening - from TV - than is Caldwell on scene.

 

Now they are showing a sequence of several messages in which Caldwell had later “UNSENT” the messages, which the FBI were unable to recover.

 

*NOTE: What have we learned from these proceedings, kids? The feds can recover virtually everything we talk about except an “UNSENT” Facebook Messenger message. (At least that was the case back in January of 2021. I’ll bet Zuckerberg’s been instructed since to make that change.)

 

——

 

I now have to step out of courtroom for my weekly appearance on TNN Live. You can listen here at top of the hour (11am-ET):

 

https://www.elasticplayer.xyz/truthnews/

 

——

 

Back from radio interview . . . 

 

More Signal chat messages between OKs, in the hours following their time at the Capitol.

 

Mehta calls morning break at 11:36am

 

——

 

Mehta returns to bench at 11:53am . . . jury back at 11:55 . . . 

 

Nestler now presenting MPD bodycam videos into evidence, additional photos, and video from “Simon.”

 

Direct of Agent Harris continues with more message and photo extractions from phones . . . Signal messages. These are more messages now from following morning, J7, in which Ed Vallejo messages early the next morning talking about doing “recon” on Capitol to assess defenses there. Then a status report on National Guard having cordoned off entire Capitol grounds. Vallejo’s messages are basically filled with “it’s not over,” “we’re at war” type lingo.

 

Signal from Harrelson asking “where’s my shit at, since it seems everyone’s left us.” (A bunch of messages from guys getting ready to leave town.)

 

Back to messages fromJ6 . . .  Caldwell: “Sharon and I assaulted the Capitol.”

 

From Watkins: hyperbolic rhetoric about storming capitol, house, senate, and fighting back cops like “spartans.”

 

Meggs: “We busted in.”

Meggs: “We looked for her.” (Pelosi)

 

Watkins (Parler post): “We stormed the Capitol today . . . “

 

Caldwell: “If we’d had guns, I guarantee we’d have killed 100 politicians.”

 

We’re seeing more messages we’ve already seen presented in previous days of trial. 

 

——

 

This is just a relentless, rapid-fire presentation of inflammatory OK messages recovered by FBI from various chat and messages platforms. Many of these we’ve seen before, from J6 and after.

 

Now showing more videos of or made by Caldwell, engaging in inflammatory language.

 

No further questions . . . 

 

<sidebar>

 

NOTE: As I’ve shared in previous weeks of this trial, Watkins and Caldwell are their own worst enemies, having both engaged in grossly hyperbolic language, and usually about actions they didn’t actually engage in. Braggadocios bravado for those OKs back home watching on TV. Way too much fuel for this fire.

 

——

 

Mehta dismisses jury and witness for lunch, and asked the attorneys to have a seat. Mehta is reviewing statements, primarily from Watkins and Caldwell, objected to by defense for submission into evidence, dealing with their alleged actions during J6. Haller argues they look bad enough as they are, but they are being put together by the government out of context, and to other people outside the conspiracy. (For instance, Caldwell brags about “being inside the Capitol,” when in fact he was not.) Mehta is simply not having any part of Haller’s arguments. He instructs her the defendants can take the stand and explain themselves if they wish, or she can present other exculpatory statements that put these in better context. Bottom line . . . these messages are coming into evidence.

 

Mehta releases everyone for lunch at 12:42pm

 

——

 

Court back in session at 1:28pm . . . 

 

Crisp comes forward to present two case precedents that ‘making a statement they know is not true - exposing themselves to criminal liability - if they don’t know they are exposing themselves in braggadocio, untrue statements, it goes against penal interests.

 

Nestler says Crisp is wrong, that because these statements corroborate the defendant’s untrustworthiness, they are admissible. Mehta acknowledges both Caldwell and Watkins make statements about their actions not borne out in truth, but Nestler says they did “storm the Capitol” because they were one the grounds itself, and that the statements corroborate actions by others in the conspiracy.

 

Haller adds to Crisp, that the rule is narrow and the statement itself needs to have culpability in having made it in such a manner they actually believe it is true.

 

Mehta: “If you’re arguing that the statement doesn’t come in at all . . . that’s not going to happen.”  But understands it may incriminate other individuals not involved in those statements. (In other words, they will come in.) Mehta says that he is going to take time to look at this more closely, and requests Crisp to send him his notes. “it’s important enough that I want to spend appropriate time on this.”

 

——

 

Fischer asks the government to pull up a Facebook message in which there’s no context or identified sender. Believes the Court had previously ruled against it, while the government disagrees. Mehta can’t remember either . . . considering the overwhelming number of such messages presented. Mehta thinks it does go to state of mind.

 

Fischer addresses another message from Caldwell which is just an off-color joke, and has no context to the event itself. Mehta allows that joke to be removed. Fischer presents another message which is a screenshot of an article sent to Caldwell - something about an explosive device - but Caldwell deleted his own response. (Not sent from a co-conspirator.) Mehta agrees to keep it out.

 

(Two small bones to defense. Mehta knows they are so light as to not tip the scale either direction. Mehta even admits that. “The government can make their point in other ways.”)

 

——

 

Yet more messages argued against - from non co-conspirator - with UNSENT responses by Caldwell, (which they can’t see.) Another off-color joke from Caldwell. Government volunteers to redact portions of the joke. (Well . . . damn. Now we won’t get the joke!) A couple more, similar messages objected to by Fischer. Images of Justice Roberts and Epstein. (Memes?) Mehta will allow.

 

Fischer now argues that certain individuals “on the board” of government’s presentation of individuals directly or indirectly involved have not been charged with crimes, and asks for limine instruction for jury. Mehta agrees.

 

Haller returns to show Mehta seven slides to which she objects, due to lack of context and fact Meggs shows his lack of understanding of the law. Mehta reviews . . . and tells her this DOES show his state of mind regarding the conspiracy itself. Basically, he presses her to prove, based on federal rules of evidence why they shouldn’t be allowed.

 

Mehta again pushes this back for a late discussion, as he wants to bring the jury back in.

 

Jury seated at 2:08pm

 

——

 

Fischer - for Caldwell - begins cross of Agent Harris. First questions are about Harris’ awareness of Caldwell’s heath conditions. Nestler objects, twice - overruled both times.

 

Fischer begins reviewing message and photo slides presented by government, attempting to put them in different context than as presented by government. Most of these are actually hyperbolic comments made by people not in DC, and not responded to by Caldwell.  Harris agrees that’s the case.

 

More messages, this time from Caldwell, in which he couldn’t have actually been DOING the actions he took credit for, as he either didn’t do those things, or wasn’t even in the area where those things were done - despite Caldwell’s use of the word “WE” when taking credit for these actions.

 

More highly inflammatory, distasteful slides in which Harris confirms the messages are sent to Caldwell from people not even in DC. More questions where Harris is forced to admit he’s never actually investigated Caldwell or even read the transcripts of those agents who did interview him.

 

Fischer has Harris read a couple of Caldwell’s most inflammatory messages. Attempts to get Harris to agree that Caldwell didn’t actually do those things. Harris says he doesn’t think they have attempted to prove Caldwell actually did any of those things.

 

——

 

Fischer replays government video leading up to where Caldwell was shown raising his arm in the air, and has Harris agree Caldwell is not assaulting any law enforcement or had no part in stealing the police riot shield. Harris agrees that he has no knowledge of Caldwell assaulting any LEO.

 

Fischer plays video where Caldwell is heard to say “Let’s go. Let’s Go,” and his wife says “Okay,” at about 2:53pm… (after Caldwell says that “Today I’m going to wipe my ass on Pelosi’s doorknob.” They obviously did not go to Pelosi’s office, (never went inside Capitol), and instead meant, let’s “leave.” Harris can neither confirm or deny that they left the area, as he’s not seen any video of them thereafter.

 

No further questions . . . 

 

Bright - for Rhodes - takes over cross. Immediately asks how long Harris has been on the J6 investigation, and states he is most familiar with Harrelson and Meggs’ cases, as he first began work on their cases while in Florida . . . but has been in DC since August.

 

——

 

Harris agrees that OKs Stack 1 and Stack 2 had no contact with each other inside the Capitol, and confirms timelines of west and east side breaches of Capitol. Now presenting Rhodes’ Signal chats stating his personal location at various times in and around the breaches of the Capitol, sent to the other OKs. Bright asks Harris to confirm how many OKs were at the Capitol, and that the groups were split up on various assignments. (Agreed.)

 

Trying to get Harris to agree that Rhodes’ communications are attempting to get the various groups of OKs to meet up with him - both those who were not in Capitol and those who weren’t. Then produces a slide where Rhodes requests anyone “not tasked with a security detail” to come to his location on Supreme Court side of Capitol. Rhodes continues sending Signal chats about his location, and requests they join him at his location.

 

Harris agrees he had never seen from any of the OKs communications they ever had a preset meeting place after the assignments. He also agrees the OKs never returned to the Capitol building after they were gathered together, and that they had exited DC before curfew implementation, and certainly long before the public was notified Congress was returning to Capitol. Harris acknowledges that there is no evidence of OKs doing anything illegal or untoward after leaving the Capitol. Harris agrees he’s never seen any order from Rhodes for OKs to enter Capitol. Harris agrees he has never seen a specific PLAN of action given to the OKs - from Rhodes or otherwise - about what they were to do that day.

 

No further questions . . . 

 

Mehta calls sidebar . . . 

 

Mehta calls for afternoon break at 3:09.

 

——

 

Everyone, including jury is back in courtroom, but we are still being blasted with whitenoise in media room.

 

We see next witness sworn in and beginning direct from government, but we can’t hear a thing.

 

We SEE a sidebar being called . . . 

 

Whitenoise stopped when they leave sidebar . . . 

 

——

 

From the questioning, we now know this is the witness from Facebook/Meta to discuss the interesting aspect of the “Unsent” messages.

 

No time limit on when a user can UNSEND a message.

 

Facebook can only review UNSENT messages for 14 days, then it is gone. Facebook only retains DELETED messages after a “preservation request” is received from law enforcement.

 

Now we’re descending into the technical details of what all the coding means in relation to how data is harvested and sent to law enforcement, from FB.

 

——

 

Gov now has META guys actually reading some of these FB messages from people never at Capitol, messaging Caldwell. <eye roll> Then, acknowledging which of Caldwell’s return comments have been UNSENT.  These are GROUP Messenger chats, in a group started by Caldwell, and he’s just reading message after message from non-defendants, non-OKs, and individuals not in DC on J6. (Seriously . . . I don’t get the point. FB techs can read?)

 

——

 

Now being asked about dates and how many messages were UNSENT on various dates. (179 of Caldwells messages UNSENT on January 15th)

 

<sidebar called>

 

Mehta returns to instruct jury those other group participants in those chats were read only to provide CONTEXT in relation to the UNSENT messages, but not the TRUTH of those statements.

 

Now showing photos and memes that were sent in the Messenger group. META guy now reading messages accompanying those photos . . . which we have already heard read by FBI agents previously. But, this time, we get to hear them read by a FB nerd who can then also tell us which of those had responses from Caldwell that are unreadable because they are UNSENT.

 

No further questions . . . 

 

——

 

Fischer - for Caldwell - begins cross. Begins by having FB nerd clarify for record the difference between a FB Page and FB Messenger.

 

UNSEND use to have a 10-minute time limit, but FB Nerd can’t recall when either Messenger went into operation, or when the 10-minute time limit was changed. Fischer is a bit indignant that he doesn’t know. Asks how long he’s worked for FB: (Since May of ’18)

 

Fischer asks for sidebar . . . 

 

——

 

Clarifying the 10-minute limit . . . one use to have actually hit “unsend” within 10 minutes for it to disappear. Fischer gets FB Nerd to clarify that his knowledge of this function is outside his job scope, and he simply doesn’t understand when the changes were implemented.

 

Fischer asks for another sidebar . . . 

 

——

 

Fischer asks, when deleting a record from FB, does FB inform user or provide a message that any such selection or UNSEND is a ‘permanent deletion’ from the company itself.

 

Fischer trying to get FB Nerd to clarify how or if everyone in Group gets message from other Group participants. FB Nerd has no way of knowing whether or not each member of Group actually gets the message.

 

Now Fischer has FB Nerd reading what are more favorable messages from that FB Group. (Turnabout is fair play, I suppose.)

 

No further questions . . . 

 

No other crosses . . . 

 

Gov redirected begins of FB Nerd.

 

——

 

Asked to read one more message and confirm the response was UNSENT.

 

No more questions.

 

Mehta dismisses the FB Nerd. (Hey . . . we didn’t hear his name . . . and FB is my favorite target . . . soooooo . . . )

 

——

 

FBI Agent returns to stand for continueance of cross exam. Haller - for Meggs - begins cross. She has awkward time getting Harris to confirm which “Kelly” was mentioned in Rhodes’ group chat. “Kellye” Sorrell, or “Kelly” Meggs. Agent responds that considering Rhodes and Sorrell had a romantic relationship, Rhodes likely knew the correct spelling of her name.

 

Haller tries to get Harris to confirm times of exit from building by members of Stack 1, and what timestamps or any were on photos taken of them outside.

 

Harris has no knowledge of what text messages between Rhodes and Meggs were either delivered or not on J6. He’s only familiar with the Signal messages.

 

Haller gets an objection and then just starts arguing directly with Nestler. Mehta: “if you all would like to continue the conversation . . .” and then held up the phone signaling a call to sidebar.

 

(At least Haller is running out the clock on the day.)

 

Harris is familiar with OK FL DC OP Jan6 chat on Signal, but has never seen the document Haller is trying to get put into evidence. (She is so flustered by Mehta . . . . and this time Mehta is being very patient with her.)

 

——

 

Harris is unfamiliar with any text messages between Meggs and other OKs or VIPS for which they were doing PSDs. Harris is being asked a series of questions about the scope of his investigations, in which Mehta interjects that her questions are actually “outside of scope.”

 

Haller continues in a series of questions in which Harris acknowledges Meggs didn’t do any of the typical bad stuff . . . 

 

No more questions . . . 

 

Mehta dimisses jury at 4:59pm

 

(Harris will be back again tomorrow.)

 

Nestler says Gov should be able to REST tomorrow, after finishing with Harris and three more short witnesses. Mehta is asking about expected times of crosses tomorrow.

 

——

 

Linder is asking if defense can make all motions on Thursday, and begin Opening for defense on Friday. Mehta laughs . . . and says he wants Reserved openings ready on Thursday morning, and they can argue motions Friday afternoon, after jury is dismissed. Witness scheduling challenges for defense discussed. Mehta is open to allowing various defense witnesses get juggled.

 

Mehta says he has never had defense defer opening in this manner, and DOES NOT WANT to hear them criticizing the government’s Case in Chief on opening. (Hmmmm.)

 

——

 

Mehta goes back to previous evidence objections by Fischer - dealing with previous testimony and allegations by gov in his trial regarding PSDs, previous marches, and implications made throughout trial that previous events were “practice runs” or “recons” or “dry runs” by other defendants not in this trial - for the purpose of J6 planning - from their Grand Jury hearing. Very confusing debate proceeds, and even Mehta feels he needs more review himself.

 

Another request by Fischer for admission of a transcript from a detention hearing was made inaccurately due to a mistake made by an AUSA. Mehta is allowing presentation of this information on a limited basis. Again, confusing considering we don’t have access to the transcript the attorneys are arguing over.

 

——

 

There are more objections and - quite serious, and quite esoteric rule problems being debated by attorneys. He agains says he will consider them over night.

 

Mehta dismisses everyone at 5:32pm.

community logo
Join the Steve Baker - TPC Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
When Dems speak to me with their outside voice

Dem poll greeter in Western NC expresses her frustrations with FEMA to me and then says, “I’m kinda discouraged to see the number of Latinos and young people that are voting for the Republicans.”

Enjoy!

00:02:02
Friday morning!

In-depth and, at times, explosive interview with @KyleSeraphin drops on @BlazeTV and http://youtube.com/@BlazeNewsTonight tomorrow morning.

00:01:59
Why doesn't the Secret Service record their radio comms?
00:01:07
TNN Live This Morning

This was an interesting - and primarily non-J6-related - discussion with Dan Newman this morning. We spent quite a bit of time discussing this new "weaponization of rape as a tool of war" in the Hamas/Israel conflict. We also cover a couple of other things, including a teaser of something else I'm going to be looking at in my upcoming visit to the Capitol CCTV viewing room.

TNN Live This Morning
TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman

Dan and I spent quite a bit of time today discussing the coming 'Big Story," as well as the recent Stephen Horn case and conviction.

TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman
This Morning on TNN Live!

If you haven't noticed, this is a pretty big news day, and Dan and I get into a lot of it. Definitely worth a listen. I especially express my frustrations with the do-nothing GOP, when so much CAN be done right now, about so MUCH that is going on.

This Morning on TNN Live!

It's Friday.., and it's not cynical...

This one struck a chord with me. I am a widower who was married for 40 years to one woman. We had two daughters, both married to their only husbands. I never did the extramarital thing.

I also have a pair of younger brothers, the youngest married to one woman for 35 years, with a married daughter and a not-yet-married son. The brother in the middle is on his 5th wife and his son and daughter have different mothers. Not trying to sport any kind of attitude.., I love them all. My point is that I can see both sides of this argument.

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/elons-baby-mama-drama-exposes-the-rights-pro-family-hypocrisy

post photo preview
Bull City Syndicate - 23 Years, and Done
New beginnings and the end of an era as I retire my bands

On December 8, 2023, Bull City Syndicate (BCS) played its final show. We went out with a bang, performing a top-shelf corporate holiday event to 700 enthusiastic attendees. Appropriately, in the city of the band’s birth — Durham, NC — The Bull City. I considered booking a final public show, but after much thought, I decided to retire the band in a more low-key, less public manner. 

In November of 2000, I answered an ad from an established local band then known as Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns. (SK) I’d spent a year getting my trumpet chops back into shape after a decade in the music business, managing other artists. I did not intend to do anything in SK other than return to my first love: just playing the trumpet. I didn’t want to manage the band and certainly had no interest in ownership. I just wanted to play again. Money didn’t matter. And in those days, even as one of the premier club bands in the Raleigh/Durham market, my share of earnings from a 9-piece horn band rarely covered my bar tab.

For many months after joining Soul Kitchen, I managed to avoid being involved in the business of the band. When asked by band members what I did for a living, I always lied and gave them a different story each time. (I remember once telling them I was in the CIA. Ha!) Finally, after a Sunday night rehearsal, drinking and smoking on the back deck of our original drummer’s house (Dave Wilkins), Dave suddenly demanded, “Baker. What the f—k do you do for a living?”

“You really want to know?”

“Yes!”

“I manage bands for a living.”

“WHAT!? Why don’t you manage this band?”

“I don’t want to. I just want to play trumpet.”

At the next week’s rehearsal, Dave handed me a manilla folder that represented the totality of the band’s “business.”

“You’re in charge now,” said Dave. 

(Sigh.)

Bull City Syndicate opening for Eddie Money in 2008

From that point forward, things began to change quickly for SK. First began a radical updating of our set list designed to draw more people to our shows and more dollars for the band. I began to pursue more private events and larger public shows. Some of the original band members were not happy about the extra demands and work required to make the move from a fun club band to a serious special event band, and we began to replace members. With the band growing in popularity, we were able to attract even more versatile and better-trained musicians. We went from being a really good band to a great "horn band," packing out every live performance and fielding requests for those higher-paying private events.

We then began to spin off a few side projects. The first of those was our pop-jazz 4-piece called Cafe Mars. Then, in 2006, we launched an aggressive recording project led by award-winning local producer John Custer. After six months in the studio, “You Make Me Feel” was released in 2007. An album paying tribute to North Carolina songwriters, and for which I’m really proud of the final product. Especially the original tunes written for the album by Custer himself. It was because of that album that Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns became Bull City Syndicate. (There were 17 other bands named Soul Kitchen at the time, and with an album containing original music, we didn’t want to deal with any trademark issues.)

Durham Herald Sun Magazine feature in 2008

When the economy began to tank in the summer of 2008 and into 2009, so many local music venues didn’t survive or cut their live music budgets drastically, and private event buyers were forced to hire smaller bands and DJs. Bull City Syndicate made the decision to add a female lead singer to the line-up — as that was a requirement of so many private event and wedding buyers. Our 9-piece “all dude” band became a 10-piece outfit, and the additional female lead remained a feature of the band for its remaining years.

Anyone managing a 10-piece band knows that turnover is going to happen — even when there’s no drama or interpersonal issues. People move away, change jobs, etc. Life happens. But, somewhere around 2010, there was a particular tumult that caused five of our members to leave, and suddenly, with no remaining original members, Bull City Syndicate became “my” band. We were able to fill the missing spots quickly, and the band really took off. No longer led by a “committee,” I was able to take the band to the next level, particularly as a private event and festival band.

Bull City Syndicate Christmas show in Raleigh, NC - 2016

There were many highlights through my time with both incarnations of the band: SK and BCS. My very first gig with SK was an opening date for Kool & The Gang. Our last such brush with greatness was when Dolly Parton joined us onstage performing her classic hit, “Jolene.”

We were honored to be the headlining entertainment for the last two NC Governor’s Inaugural Balls. We performed for some of the largest companies and charities in America: SAS, Glaxo, AT&T, American Heart Association, and too many others to list. We traveled throughout the Mid-Atlantic region for shows — as far north as Maryland and even down to Florida.

Our first spin-off, Cafe Mars, eventually became a 6-piece version of the band called BCS Express. Then, 10 years ago, we added a “yacht rock” version of the band called Captain & The Keels. (C&K) The same line-up as BCS, doing the smooth rock hits from ’75 to ’85, with appropriate foolish costumes.

Captain & The Keels in Hampton, VA - 2016

In 2018 came my most fun spin-off. A David Bowie Tribute act called The American Bowie Experience. (ABX) With that group, we moved our bassist, Randy Ines, over to keys (because of his virtuoso piano chops), and brought my son Duncan in on bass guitar. (Bowie’s son is also named Duncan. Just a coincidence.) Despite the growing popularity and demand for ABX, that band didn’t survive the COVID-19 pandemic after a year and a half of lockdowns. It was everything I could do just to get BCS back to work.

American Bowie Experience at House of Blues in Myrtle Beach, SC - 2019

The aftermath of the pandemic was the beginning of the end for BCS. My life began to change drastically. For more than 25 years I’d been a hobbyist political writer and commentator. My writing chops began to take shape in the early days of the Internet. AOL, Compuserve, and Prodigy eventually became MySpace. MySpace became Facebook, where my online following really began to take off. 

In early 2020 — long after the four versions of the band had become my full-time job and main source of income — “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve” became two months of COVID lockdowns, and none of the band projects were allowed to do live performances. It was then that I decided to monetize my writing “hobby,” moving that to the captain’s seat of my endeavors and BCS and its spinoffs to the co-pilot’s seat. By 2022 and into 2023, my journalistic efforts were being rewarded with significant media attention, and my travels were keeping me away from the band and its needs with increasing frequency. 

In the summer of 2023, I was approached by Dallas-based Blaze Media to become a contributing writer. I was now splitting most of my time between D.C. and Dallas, and the bands’ bookings were suffering. With that came the hard decision that ultimately led me to retire from the BCS and C&K brands, make the total life transition and reinvention to a full-time writer and investigative journalist for The Blaze.

An appearance on The Glenn Beck Show in 2023

I’ve been doing music in one form or the other for over 50 years. At 19 years old, I was traveling the world playing trumpet. In the 80s, I was working for churches doing music and promoting contemporary Christian music concerts with the biggest names in that industry. Into the 90s, I became manager to national acts touring around the world — which caused me to put my horns in the closet for about 10 years. By 1999, I just wanted to play music again, and I answered that ad to join Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns.

Obviously, this telling is the very short version of that 23-year experience, and what became such a significant part of my life. There were hard times and bad times, but mostly wonderful times with all the guys and gals I was honored to perform with. We played for near-empty rooms and for as many as 40,000 at festivals. We shared the stage with famous artists and many of the best local musicians and bands. I will always cherish every moment.

BCS Express in Cary, NC - 2013

I want to express my heartfelt thanks and admiration to all the fantastic musicians who made those 23 years unforgettable. And to the fans who continued to show up for our infrequent club shows in the last couple of years. Many who’d been coming to see us for over 20 years!

At our final Durham show on December 8, I stepped off the stage a few times just to watch and soak it in. After the last song, and when we began the final tear-down and load-out of the gear, one of the guys said to me, “You know you’re going to miss this.”

Yes . . . I am.

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Brief Summary of My Personal January 6 Story Timeline (Then ’til Now)
Mainly For Newer Followers, Not Yet Up-to-Speed on My Work

A more detailed account of my day on January 6, 2021, can be found here:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc


 

-On Dec. 21, 2020 — two days after Trump announced his own "wild" J6 rally at The Ellipse in D.C. — I posted this announcement to my social media accounts:

“Regardless of how you feel about the election results, this might be a spectacle worth observing up close and personal. (I'm predisposed to believe this crowd will not riot, loot, and burn the city.) I might begin my northeast run on this date, in DC. Anyone else going? #tpcroadtrip2021”

Well . . . they didn't "burn the city."

——

-In my email newsletter that went out on January 4, 2021, I made the following comment:

“I am headed to DC on Wednesday. Why? Not because I think a crowd of any size is going to force government into a real investigation of the election results, but because the “powers that be” on all sides of the political equation need to see WE THE PEOPLE in force, letting them know that WE ARE WATCHING. WE are engaged! WE are not going to lay down to any level of tyranny — whether it comes from the right or the left, the Democrats or the GOP. I’m also hoping to document on video anything “special” that might happen, and perhaps get a few interviews from a variety of voices.”

-By “special” . . . it was rumored there would be some big announcement on the election controversy, (a release of The Kraken, maybe), about which I hoped to get comments from members of the crowd. There was nothing special announced from the stage, by Trump or any of the others. The “special” came later . . . unexpectedly.

——

-I arrived at the Washington Monument at about 9:30 am on January 6, and spent the next three hours watching the crowd grow to an enormous size — documenting it on video.

-Trump took the stage almost an hour later than announced, at 11:57 pm. His “warm-up” acts were ‘meh,’ and his speech was equally ‘meh.’ Because of the cold, windy conditions, the poor audio, and wanting to get ahead of the throng that was scheduled to march on the Capitol for the other events, I left the Washington Monument lawn about halfway through Trump’s speech and began a brisk walk toward the Capitol Building . . . along with thousands of others already peeling off from Trump's speech.

-I arrived at the Reflection Pool on the west side of the Capitol at about 1:15 pm, where I was hearing police sirens and what sounded like explosions. From there, I could see smoke and the arrival of DC Metro PD (MPD) units pouring down the steps toward the west terrace. I made the decision to sprint up to the terrace, where I turned on my camera at 1:19 pm, and for almost an hour filmed the violence and surging crowds in that area.

-Just after 2:00 pm I began to notice signs of Capitol Police (USCP) withdrawal. Shortly thereafter, there was a sudden surge of protestors up the stairs underneath the scaffolding on the northwest side of the terrace. Hundreds of protestors were now in unrestricted movement up those stairs, so I followed.

-At approximately 2:21 pm I followed hundreds of protestors through what some call the “Senate Wing door.” This, I would later learn, was the site of the first breach of the building. I did not see the breach, as it occurred at approximately 2:13 pm, while I was still on the lower terrace.

-For almost 40 minutes I captured scenes inside the Capitol Building, before exiting at about 2:59 pm, at the exact location where FBI tactical unit medics were trying to save Ashli Babbit’s life. Just over one minute after I exited through the South door, I filmed Babbitt’s extraction through that doorway, while the D.C. Fire EMT crew still worked feverishly on her lifeless body.

Screenshot from my video - January 6, 2021 - of Ashli Babbitt being evacuated from
the Capitol Building by D.C. Fire Department emergency medical techs.

-Shortly thereafter, I gave a couple of interviews to local media, found a restroom and a sandwich, then returned to the Capitol to witness the arrival of the Army and Air Force National Guards finalize the clearing of the entire Capitol grounds. I then returned to my hotel in Arlington sometime after 7:30 pm.

——

-For the next five days I began frame by frame review of my videos, and then started writing my first story about the event, which was posted on January 13, 2021:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-On February 24, 2021, I published my second story about J6:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-As I’ve pointed out many times, I got a few things wrong in my earliest analyses. I’ve tried to correct those over the following months and years as new evidence has presented itself. But, those two articles remain as written — errors included.

——

-Because I engaged in no violence, property damage, chanting, singing, carried no flags, and wore no political messages on my clothing . . . as the months wore on I began to think maybe I was going to have the same respect as so many other journalists who were not being rounded up in the J6 dragnet. But, on the morning of July 22, 2021, I received a phone call from FBI Special Agent Gerrit Doss. After he asked me for a voluntary interview, I immediately turned that over to my local attorney, and they worked together with all our schedules to arrange a date for the interview.

-The first attempt at scheduling the FBI interview was aborted on-site, on the morning of August 5, 2021. The reason given — after my attorney and I had already arrived at their Cary, NC filed office — was that they could not interview me, “because of my press status,” until after they received a letter of approval from the U.S. Attorney General’s office.

-My attorney worked with an assistant USAG, they negotiated a proffer agreement for the interview, and it was rescheduled for October 18, 2021. I was interviewed for two full hours, under the agreement that nothing I said in the interview could be used against me — should charges be made against me — in court . . . unless I perjured myself. (That didn’t happen.)

-On November 17, 2021, my attorney received an email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Anita Eve — out of Philadelphia — stating, “Your client will be charged within the week.”

-On Monday morning of Thanksgiving week — November 22, 2021 — we sent out approximately 200 press releases to all manner of media sources, stating that I — an independent journalist — was about to be prosecuted for nothing more than the act of “journalism” on January 6.

-At approximately 1:00 pm that same day, AUSA Eve sent my attorney a copy of that press release, stating, “We’re not happy about this.” He responded, asking, “Are you saying my client should forego his 1st Amendment right because he is being persecuted by the federal government?" There were a couple of other exchanges between my attorney and the AUSA before she went silent. I assumed that was because of the Thanksgiving holiday.

-My phone began to ring from interested media sources, wishing to cover my story.

-On Tuesday evening — November 23 — I received a call from Senator Ron Johnson (WI), asking me how he could help. As the minority leader of a Senate J6 investigative committee, he put me in touch with his investigators.

-On Wednesday morning — November 24 — I was contacted by an attorney who practices criminal law in D.C., who happened to be a federal prosecutor for more than 20 years. After a three-hour phone call, I engaged his services.

-On Monday — November 29 — my new attorney reached out to AUSA Eve by both email and phone, and she never responded. We never heard from her or the FBI again . . . until yesterday — August 5, 2023 — more than 20 months later, when my Raleigh attorney received a call from the FBI notifying him that they had “service of process” for me.

-This turns out to be a Grand Jury subpoena, requesting my January 6 videos. My attorney received that on Monday. We have been able to determine the DOJ has reopened its investigation into my January 6 activities. I volunteered to give those to the FBI during my interview in October of ’21, but they never followed up and requested them. The most unfortunate fact is . . . grand juries are not convened to investigate misdemeanor crimes. For unknown reasons, they are apparently considering a felony recommendation to the grand jury. As of this writing, that is all we know.

——

-Since January 6, 2021, as well as the time since my threatened prosecution, I have been very active in investigating many aspects related to January 6. Something I never expected to be engaged in. I have broken original stories, developed Capitol Police whistleblowers, met with Congress Members, and engaged with congressional staffers and investigators. All of that has been well documented in my blogs.

-In the fall of 2022, I covered every day of the first, nine-week-long Oath Keepers trial, at the District Courthouse in D.C.

-I’ve been interviewed for my work by innumerable media sources — large and small — from Tucker Carlson on Fox News, to reporters with both NBC and the New York Times, to smaller podcasters. I’ve also collaborated on several stories with The Epoch Times, and have been one of a small hand full of journalists who’ve been given access to that “41,000 hours of J6 video” by Speaker McCarthy’s staff. I am just now entering into a “contributor” relationship with Blaze Media.

placeholder

As I said in the beginning, this is an abbreviated overview of my personal “January 6 story.” I have no idea what the government’s renewed interest is in me or my videos. The only “crime” I committed on January 6 — technically speaking — is to have entered a restricted building. But, so did some 80 to 100 other journalists who have not been charged with any crimes. We all simply followed the story where the story went that day.

It would be easy to speculate that I might be being singled out because I haven’t conformed to the “preferred narrative,” or because of the sensitivity of certain stories I’m currently working on. I simply have no idea, so can’t really go there. Not at least until I see the subpoena on Monday, and we can get some questions answered about the status of my case . . . which went from “Your client will be charged within the week” to total silence from the DOJ for more than a year and a half.

Some say there are “no coincidences” in this particular game . . . but we’ll know more on Monday.

Stay tuned . . .

Steve

P.S. I have no idea what they're looking for in my videos. What's so special, that it requires a Grand Jury subpoena? All the good stuff is already posted online:

placeholder

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Tweetstorm Rollout on Secret U.S. Army SpecOps Deployed on January 6
Having no name, this top secret group is referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange”

THREAD: Two and 1/2 years ago, in my 2nd article about #Jan6, (Feb. 24, 2021), I revealed a “very high probability that both [Army] ’Special Forces’ operatives and U.S. Marshalls were mixed in with the crowd that entered the Capitol Building.”

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3842175/who-was-up-the-chain-on-january-6

——

10 months later (Jan. 3, 2022) Newsweek confirmed my sourcing with a story headlined, “Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol.” saying, “The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown.”

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-secret-commandos-shoot-kill-authority-were-capitol-1661330

——

I have quietly investigated this discovery ever since and eventually revealed my knowledge of a SpecOps group deployed on J6 to be a top-secret SIGINT group from Ft. Belvoir, just outside D.C. (I have no info if this is the same group Newsweek reported.)

——

I have long been aware of a current member of this “unit” deployed to the Capitol on J6. Late in 2022, I was introduced to a retired member of the same SpecOps group. In short, he was highly impressed with my knowledge of that unit, as they officially . . . “do not exist.”

——

They may not officially “exist,” but in 2007, British author @MickWSmith revealed the existence and history of this U.S. Army SpecOps group in his book, “Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team”

https://www.amazon.com/Killer-Elite-Completely-Americas-Operations-dp-1250006473/dp/1250006473/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

Unlike the SEALS or Delta Force, this secretive Army team does not have a name. Only their specific operations are given a name, and they are otherwise generally referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange.”

——

My source, who is a retired member of “the unit” does not believe his former group could possibly have been used for any purpose on J6, as it is outside the operational protocols of their mission. Namely, when he was a member, they would never be used for domestic operations.

——

Also, he says they would never have been “seconded” to @FBI. They have a specific chain of command within the Army hierarchy and are only ever seconded to the CIA in overseas ops. That said, he has been retired from “the unit” for almost a decade.

——

In my recent interactions with congressional members and staff, I have been informed that they are aware the “the unit” was operational in some capacity on J6, but have been unable to get answers from @DeptofDefense, specifically because they “do not officially exist.”

——

In recent weeks, trying to get more information, I’ve read another team of special ‘intel’ investigators into my research on this subject. Our most recent discovery is that they have been able to identify another current member of “the unit” who was at the Capitol on J6.

——

Before I go any further in this narrative, I'll emphasize that I've never implied “the unit” was deployed on J6 for nefarious purposes. In my 1st story, I theorized that they were simply there to “take care of business” should protestors get out of hand, using lethal weapons.

——

That established, their presence and deployment raises serious questions. Why are military forces being deployed in violation of posse comitatus law? Is it common practice for @DeptofDefense to allow military SpecOps to be used at domestic protest events?

——

More importantly, if this is not common, and was a one-off operation . . . having “the unit” seconded to @FBI on J6 . . . WHY? What did they know, requiring “the unit's” presence at the Capitol, and what was “the unit’s” “posture” on J6?

——

We are seeking more information, and answers to those questions, but do not expect to receive those directly from @FBI, @CapitolPolice, (if they even knew), or from @DeptofDefense. But, you may be asking why I’m talking about this without having all the facts nailed down.

——

My @FBI whistleblowing friends, @KyleSeraphin and @RealStevefriend have advised me that “daylight” is not only the “best disinfectant,” but also the best “protection” when one is hovering this close over the target. 

——

I don’t have the same covering as that afforded a reliable MSM journalist - as when @FBI had Newsweek’s @warkin release a one-year anniversary CYA story about their deployment of every 3-letter agencies’ tactical teams and military commandos with “shoot to kill” orders on J6.

——

So . . . I’m letting @FBI and @DeptofDefense know that I’ve now read three other friendly journalists, a team of think tank investigators, and several congressional staffers into the details of this story. “Whacking” me, to stop my work, will probably be counterproductive.

——

But, they are welcome to reach out to me and answer my questions. (I also have more.) I’m certain they already have my number. 

Stay tuned. More on this, and even more important J6 stories are in the pipeline. 

——

On Twitter, (or, X):

https://twitter.com/TPC4USA/status/1686907274692861952

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals