Steve Baker - TPC
News • Politics • Writing
Steve's Unedited Tweetstorm from Day 13 of Oath Keepers Trial
“We need to stick to the objective, and protect those in the building from violence . . . including members and staff.”
October 21, 2022
post photo preview

Day 13 of Oath Keepers Trial

***Before I begin . . . remember, this tweetstorm is unedited, and posted as fast as I could get the highlights out, but a very interesting message was revealed in the "OK FL" Signal chat group, which the government conveniently left out of their direct questioning yesterday of witness, FBI Special Agent Drew -- yet she was forced to read it aloud during cross-examination this morning:

“We need to stick to the objective, and protect those in the building from violence . . . including members and staff.” -Unnamed Oath Keeper, from Signal chats recovered by FBI, after violence had broken out on January 6

We'll see if any MSM outlets incude that in their stories. Now, to the tweetstorm . . . 



Steve Bannon also in Courthouse today. (Sentencing)


Mehta begins at 9:02am, with a request of the legal teams to give him some “sense” of how much longer this trip will take, so that he can so inform the jurors. (Not now, but soon.)


Jury seated at 9:04 . . . Agent Drew retakes the stand . . . Bright - for Rhodes - begins cross examination.




Bright asks if the Agent has actually interviewed any of THESE defendants. At first she says, “no, then corrects herself, and indicates she HAS met with on of the defendants . . . Mehta immediately interrupts, and calls a sidebar . . . “We need to talk about that.” . . . (Hmmmm.)


Back from sidebar . . . Bright is forced to abandon that question. (Why?)  He rephrases, “You don’t really know the individual mindset of each of these defendants.”


Bright gets Agent to admit that she DID NOT put together that media presentation by the government yesterday. She dd not individually select the messages, videos, or content of the presentation. Only validated those items the government selected.




Agent says she’s not aware of Michael Greene’s other operational duties on the day of January 6th . . . as related to the security details he was overseeing as OK “operational leader.” (What kind of investigator is she, actually?)


Bright reads her a chat message from an individual which she cannot identify . . . but which she validated yesterday. “Patriots in Capitol” at 2:07pm . . . precedes the OKs entry into the Capitol by at 30 minutes.  Bright already has her rattled, because the implication yesterday was that the message referred to OKs.


Message from Greene, “We need to regroup any members who are not on mission” (2:15pm) A message to entire group. Bright begins to get her to admit - without context - she can’t confer what this message was referring to . . . . . . Bright once again force to rephrase. “The intent of this could be open to interpretation?” She evades.




Bright is having Agent Drew review several of the text and Signal messages they displayed yesterday . . . but gets her to admit that many of those messages were DELAYED in delivery by as much as 5 and a half hours because of the bandwidth overload on J6. She admits that many of those messages presented by government yesterday were not delivered to intended recipient until long after they had left the Capitol. She admits from data supplied by phone carriers that those messages were not received until hours later.




Bright brings up that in a previous testimony - under oath - she’d referred to Kellye Sorrell as Rhodes “lawyer”, but yesterday called her “his girlfriend.” She said “I don’t recall” - several times. Bright points out he has the transcript from that previous trial, and she says, “Okay, whatever that says.”


Bright is showing her additional messages sent in which Rhodes and Greene are trying to get all the OKs to regroup - in a very confusing situation - “near the trailers” . . . “south side of the capitol . . . just left of dome.” In fact, Rhodes was never on that side of the Capitol, by her own investigation . . . so he was confused at where he was located, giving bad directions. As well as other bad directions, giving conflicting directions that don’t comport with the landmarks Rhodes mentioned. Agent agrees Rhodes has no idea where he is when sending messages to other OKs. Over and over he get the Agent to agree these “out-of-towners” have no idea how to give accurate directions to each other around the Capitol.




Bright: “Are you familiar with the concept of a QRF?”

Agent: “Yes.”  - (Then she defines. She agrees it is a “reaction” force, not an offensive force.)


Bright: “Have you seen a single chat of any kind that indicates the QRF was ever called in.”

Agent: “Based on my knowledge, they did remain in VA.”


Message from Vallejo: “Have two trucks available. Let me know how I can assist.”

Agent: “I don’t recall a direct response” [to that message]

Bright: “No body responded to him at all?”

Agent: “Correct, to my recollection.”


Message from Vallejo : “QRF standing by at hotel. Just say the word…”

Bright: “Does he get a return response?”

Agent: “Not as far as I know.”


Bright: “The biggest event at the Capitol since attack in War of 1812, and no one responds to bring the weapons over?”

Agent: “Correct.”




Bright shows that they presented Zello chats yesterday which had nothing to do with the defendants in this room, and for which there was no evidence that Rhodes was on, at all. By her investigation . . . she agrees.


Bright: “At no point is there a message, email, or chat containing a direct order for the OKs to enter the Capitol?”

Agent: “That’s correct.”


Bright: “No such order from Mr. Rhodes?”

Agent: “I did not see an order from Mr. Rhodes.”


Bright: “Did Rhodes enter the capitol? . . . have a bull horn? . . . did he give any orders?  . . . did he tear down any barriers?”

Agent: “Not to my knowledge.”






Bright is getting her to acknowledge that the initial breaches of barriers occurred long before Rhodes was even on Capitol Hill.


Bright: “Are you aware that there were multiple permitted events scheduled that day?”

Agent: “yes”


Bright: “Are you aware that Rhodes was an invited speaker at one of those events that day?”

Agent: (She really tried to evade, but eventually acknowledged) “Yes.)


Bright is done . . . Woodward - for Meggs - begins cross . . . 




Woodard gets Agent Drew to read chat messages from OK leaders specifically telling them not to bring anything that can be deemed lethal to the Capitol. 


Woodward has her read further messages regarding bringing med kits and chats about the specifics regarding OK security details that morning.


Agent: “Based on their message content I have no reason to doubt that they provided security details on the morning of January 6.”


Woodward then takes Agent through dozens of messages which were NOT presented by the government yesterday, specifically dealing with the scheduling, organization, and “ALL DAY” security planning at the various events legally permitted throughout the day of Jan 6. (Which was the OKs reason for being there.) 


***NOTE: Bright previously got the Agent to admit that many of these messages were never delivered because of cell traffic overload, and as a result, comms and coordination broke down. NOT TO MENTION . . . once the OKs arrived at the Capitol, ALL HELL was already breaking loose, due to no action or fault of their own. As a result, the scheduled events for which they were providing security, and walking from The Ellipse to the Capitol for, were already disrupted because of the chaos and violence created by OTHERS. To the extent the OKs “trespassed” or “paraded” on Capitol grounds . . . the one thing that is most apparent, is there was no “conspiracy” to insurrection.***


Mehta calls morning break at 10:25 . . . 




Mehta back at 10:46am . . . asks about previous question on trial length. AUSA Nestler says they should be complete with government’s case by the end of next week. Defense all offer varying lengths for their individual clients: 1 to 3 days, each. Plus government rebuttal . . . closing arguments . . . Mehta estimates this trial could go through week of Nov. 7th or 14th.


Jury re-seated at 10:51am . . . Woodward resumes cross of Agent Drew.


Woodward shows a message slide presented by government that misrepresents who sent the messages from Meggs, when it was actually from Rhodes.


Message they left out: “We need to stick to the objective, and protect those in the building from violence . . . including members and staff.”


“I think the police are gong to be overwhelm . . . too many people . . . “


“This is f-cking ANTIFA . . . none of our OKs were allowed to carry backpacks . . . they’re using lumber . . . this is a f-cking set-up”




Agent testifies she does not know “Jim Donaldson” . . . yet she read some very inflammatory messages by Donaldson, yesterday . . . but failed to read the message where he sends his regrets, because he was AT HOME, sitting in a doctors office! . . . (Oops) . . . when sending those chat messages. He wasn’t even in DC.


Woodward now presents call detail records that she created and went through yesterday . . . Agent is suddenly going back into “I don’t recall” mode, once she is confronted with answering details about how she compiled this record of phone calls from mobile carriers.


Woodward shows her the long and confusing summary given to FBI of the phone data. He is having her verify the time zones clarification used by carriers. UTC time (standardized) vs. using US time zones, is provided by phone carriers so everyone can see same time on calls across time zones.


Agent testified yesterday the records she presented were “true and accurate.” Woodward is taking her through calls between Meggs and Watkins she presented yesterday, misrepresented the actual times of the calls by FIVE hours, making the context of those calls immaterial to what was happening at the Capitol on the 6th.




Woodward now brings forward Dolan’s cellphone video after the barrier breach on the east side of Capitol. Large crowd is moving toward Capitol, but Dolan is not moving toward Capitol. Audio:


Dolan: “I think we should go”

Harrelson: “Huh?”




Woodward now replaying government-presented video from yesterday which represented Meggs holding up his fist to wave other OKs forward as crowd was surging into Capitol. Then he plays longer source video from which the government’s short clips were derived. Showing several other people fist pumping hands in air to the chant of “We want Trump.” This contradicts government’s assertion that Meggs was using his fist to direct OKs toward the door, which they selectively and highly edited, leaving out all the other people pumping their fists into the air.




Woodward gets Agent to agree that Meggs was only in the Capitol for about 20 minutes. Begins showing CCTV video from Rotunda camera. He then presents a photo Agent presented yesterday, of “Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi” sign she took months after J6. He then asks if she knew that sign had been damaged and removed duing the riot of J6? “Yes.” He then enters into evidence  a new video, showing same area during riot, after sign had been removed.






He has Agent read transcript of testimony about the destruction of that sign, and the shards being handed out . . . including reference to someone videoing the scene.




***Side Note: I was the one who actually captured video of that sign at the moment it was being damaged and broken into small pieces, and handed out among protestors as souvenirs.***




Woodward now shows the government’s presentation of OKs coming up on USCP officer Harry Dunn, (including Stephen Horn’s video), 


Woodward: “Did you interview officer Dunn as part of your investigation?”


Woodward: “Do you understand that they tried to protect officer Dunn?



Mehta the tells Woodward to move on past the Dunn sequence of events. (WTF?!)


***F-CKING GOVERNMENT IS COVERING UP THIS EVENT!!!! This is THE issue behind Moseley’s threat to release the FBI 302, and for which Mehta called that “sealed session” last week. They know how damaging this sequence is to the government’s.***


Woodward moves on to showing more video of Meggs’ non-violent, peaceful interactions and behavior while inside the Capitol. Long sequences, including gestures for people to leave (Agent: “He appears to make that gesture.”) Peaceful interactions with police officers. Then shows his exit thru east doors. Now showing photos after Meggs exited building.


No further questions . . . Geyer - for Harrelson - takes over cross




Geyer: “You’re aware my client had no FB, Twitter, or other social media of any kind since 2014?”

Agent: “Yes”


Geyer: “He’s not on DC OP chat til Jan 3?”

Agent: “Yes”


Geyer: “Harrelson is not on any of the call lists you presented yesterday, correct?”

Agent: “Yes”


Geyer: “My client only met Jason Dolan on Jan4, and they traveled together to do security on 5th and 6th?”

Agent: I’m aware they travelled together.


Geyer pulls up government presentation of Zello account assigned to Hrreslon, and begins trying to show her that all the users and interactions on that account are Harrelson’s sons, family, and gamers his kids interact with. Not Ken’s interactions. And that the account is actually in Ken’s wife’s name. (‘Cajun Queen”). The Agent would not acknowledge that she had any knowledge of who the people were in the data SHE claims to have investigated. But, did acknowledge that Harrelson was not on Zello during 6th.


Geyer then shows the screen shot from HArrelson’s iPhone which notifications shows backlog of unopened messages during the day of J6. Agent agrees it’s a significant number of unopened messages.


Geyer shows government video of Dolan and Harrelson which began after they arrived on Capitol lawn. He asks if she will agree they are doing security detail prior? She would only acknowledge she’d seen video as they were walking toward Capitol with a group of people who were not OKs.


Mehta asks Geyer how much longer his presentation today will go (11:59) . . . then he announces end of session for today.




Mehta then tells jury that evidence presentation for this trial could go into the week of Nov. 7th, then send them home for the weekend. Dismisses Agent Drew. 


Nestler asks to meet with Agent Drew through weekend to prepare her for next round of direct testimony, despite the fact she is currently under orders not to discuss her current testimony with anyone. Crisp objects. Mehta agrees to allow Nestler to “send her the presentations” for review.


Court dismissed at 12:05pm.


See ya on Monday!

community logo
Join the Steve Baker - TPC Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
What else you may like…
Bongino Says He Loves Me

I got a shoutout from Dan Bongino yesterday. 😄

Locals Exclusive Video Message

Hello All!

I just need 8 minutes of your time to tell you about my doings in DC next week. Please check out the attached video.

Thank you!!


A one-time donation here on Locals:

PayPal is the easiest and quickest:

Or, for larger contributions for which you need a tax-deductible receipt, mail a check payable to: "FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation" - and send it to:

Steve Baker
3903 Carpenter Pond Road
Durham, NC 27703

The Left Have Lost Their Minds Today

But even NC's GOP Sen. Tillis called Tucker's story last night, "Bullsh-t."

This short video shows how successfully pervasive was the #Jan6 disinformation narrative. From my appearance on Good Morning Britain, last year:

“The building is now pretty much back to normal. You can’t see any scratches or bullet marks.” -Lorna Shaddick (GMB)

Bullet marks? 🙄

If GOP lawmakers are also so brain-damaged by the left's successful propaganda, you know a DC jury has no chance of rendering a fair and impartial verdict for J6 defendants.

(BTW . . . A 15-minute interview cut down to less than 15 seconds. Not much allowance for context. Ha!)

TNN Live This Morning

This was an interesting - and primarily non-J6-related - discussion with Dan Newman this morning. We spent quite a bit of time discussing this new "weaponization of rape as a tool of war" in the Hamas/Israel conflict. We also cover a couple of other things, including a teaser of something else I'm going to be looking at in my upcoming visit to the Capitol CCTV viewing room.

TNN Live This Morning
TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman

Dan and I spent quite a bit of time today discussing the coming 'Big Story," as well as the recent Stephen Horn case and conviction.

TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman
This Morning on TNN Live!

If you haven't noticed, this is a pretty big news day, and Dan and I get into a lot of it. Definitely worth a listen. I especially express my frustrations with the do-nothing GOP, when so much CAN be done right now, about so MUCH that is going on.

This Morning on TNN Live!
17 hours ago

I just watched the Trump speech at the libertarian convention. He actually talked about the 10th amendment!!! He offered us a meaningful voice in the White House!!! But apparently Libertarians care more about prostitution and pot than about free speech, crushing taxation, preventing ww3, the Constitution, freeing political prisoners, or freedom of religion. We are so embarrassing.

I think I may have just witnessed the death of the Libertarian Party.

Something Different

Something to destress with. A discussion of Frank Herbert's Dune. (Unless you get worked up about who did it better, Lynch or Villeneuve?😆) My chat with @Thebigv75 (Vince Salerno) about my favorite author's magnum opus and those who've tried to adapt it to film and TV.

The last words of the conquered are usually variations of, “It can’t happen here.”

Victor Davis Hanson has been thinking about how everyone seems to be so spun up lately and has some observations to share.

post photo preview
Bull City Syndicate - 23 Years, and Done
New beginnings and the end of an era as I retire my bands

On December 8, 2023, Bull City Syndicate (BCS) played its final show. We went out with a bang, performing a top-shelf corporate holiday event to 700 enthusiastic attendees. Appropriately, in the city of the band’s birth — Durham, NC — The Bull City. I considered booking a final public show, but after much thought, I decided to retire the band in a more low-key, less public manner. 

In November of 2000, I answered an ad from an established local band then known as Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns. (SK) I’d spent a year getting my trumpet chops back into shape after a decade in the music business, managing other artists. I did not intend to do anything in SK other than return to my first love: just playing the trumpet. I didn’t want to manage the band and certainly had no interest in ownership. I just wanted to play again. Money didn’t matter. And in those days, even as one of the premier club bands in the Raleigh/Durham market, my share of earnings from a 9-piece horn band rarely covered my bar tab.

For many months after joining Soul Kitchen, I managed to avoid being involved in the business of the band. When asked by band members what I did for a living, I always lied and gave them a different story each time. (I remember once telling them I was in the CIA. Ha!) Finally, after a Sunday night rehearsal, drinking and smoking on the back deck of our original drummer’s house (Dave Wilkins), Dave suddenly demanded, “Baker. What the f—k do you do for a living?”

“You really want to know?”


“I manage bands for a living.”

“WHAT!? Why don’t you manage this band?”

“I don’t want to. I just want to play trumpet.”

At the next week’s rehearsal, Dave handed me a manilla folder that represented the totality of the band’s “business.”

“You’re in charge now,” said Dave. 


Bull City Syndicate opening for Eddie Money in 2008

From that point forward, things began to change quickly for SK. First began a radical updating of our set list designed to draw more people to our shows and more dollars for the band. I began to pursue more private events and larger public shows. Some of the original band members were not happy about the extra demands and work required to make the move from a fun club band to a serious special event band, and we began to replace members. With the band growing in popularity, we were able to attract even more versatile and better-trained musicians. We went from being a really good band to a great "horn band," packing out every live performance and fielding requests for those higher-paying private events.

We then began to spin off a few side projects. The first of those was our pop-jazz 4-piece called Cafe Mars. Then, in 2006, we launched an aggressive recording project led by award-winning local producer John Custer. After six months in the studio, “You Make Me Feel” was released in 2007. An album paying tribute to North Carolina songwriters, and for which I’m really proud of the final product. Especially the original tunes written for the album by Custer himself. It was because of that album that Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns became Bull City Syndicate. (There were 17 other bands named Soul Kitchen at the time, and with an album containing original music, we didn’t want to deal with any trademark issues.)

Durham Herald Sun Magazine feature in 2008

When the economy began to tank in the summer of 2008 and into 2009, so many local music venues didn’t survive or cut their live music budgets drastically, and private event buyers were forced to hire smaller bands and DJs. Bull City Syndicate made the decision to add a female lead singer to the line-up — as that was a requirement of so many private event and wedding buyers. Our 9-piece “all dude” band became a 10-piece outfit, and the additional female lead remained a feature of the band for its remaining years.

Anyone managing a 10-piece band knows that turnover is going to happen — even when there’s no drama or interpersonal issues. People move away, change jobs, etc. Life happens. But, somewhere around 2010, there was a particular tumult that caused five of our members to leave, and suddenly, with no remaining original members, Bull City Syndicate became “my” band. We were able to fill the missing spots quickly, and the band really took off. No longer led by a “committee,” I was able to take the band to the next level, particularly as a private event and festival band.

Bull City Syndicate Christmas show in Raleigh, NC - 2016

There were many highlights through my time with both incarnations of the band: SK and BCS. My very first gig with SK was an opening date for Kool & The Gang. Our last such brush with greatness was when Dolly Parton joined us onstage performing her classic hit, “Jolene.”

We were honored to be the headlining entertainment for the last two NC Governor’s Inaugural Balls. We performed for some of the largest companies and charities in America: SAS, Glaxo, AT&T, American Heart Association, and too many others to list. We traveled throughout the Mid-Atlantic region for shows — as far north as Maryland and even down to Florida.

Our first spin-off, Cafe Mars, eventually became a 6-piece version of the band called BCS Express. Then, 10 years ago, we added a “yacht rock” version of the band called Captain & The Keels. (C&K) The same line-up as BCS, doing the smooth rock hits from ’75 to ’85, with appropriate foolish costumes.

Captain & The Keels in Hampton, VA - 2016

In 2018 came my most fun spin-off. A David Bowie Tribute act called The American Bowie Experience. (ABX) With that group, we moved our bassist, Randy Ines, over to keys (because of his virtuoso piano chops), and brought my son Duncan in on bass guitar. (Bowie’s son is also named Duncan. Just a coincidence.) Despite the growing popularity and demand for ABX, that band didn’t survive the COVID-19 pandemic after a year and a half of lockdowns. It was everything I could do just to get BCS back to work.

American Bowie Experience at House of Blues in Myrtle Beach, SC - 2019

The aftermath of the pandemic was the beginning of the end for BCS. My life began to change drastically. For more than 25 years I’d been a hobbyist political writer and commentator. My writing chops began to take shape in the early days of the Internet. AOL, Compuserve, and Prodigy eventually became MySpace. MySpace became Facebook, where my online following really began to take off. 

In early 2020 — long after the four versions of the band had become my full-time job and main source of income — “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve” became two months of COVID lockdowns, and none of the band projects were allowed to do live performances. It was then that I decided to monetize my writing “hobby,” moving that to the captain’s seat of my endeavors and BCS and its spinoffs to the co-pilot’s seat. By 2022 and into 2023, my journalistic efforts were being rewarded with significant media attention, and my travels were keeping me away from the band and its needs with increasing frequency. 

In the summer of 2023, I was approached by Dallas-based Blaze Media to become a contributing writer. I was now splitting most of my time between D.C. and Dallas, and the bands’ bookings were suffering. With that came the hard decision that ultimately led me to retire from the BCS and C&K brands, make the total life transition and reinvention to a full-time writer and investigative journalist for The Blaze.

An appearance on The Glenn Beck Show in 2023

I’ve been doing music in one form or the other for over 50 years. At 19 years old, I was traveling the world playing trumpet. In the 80s, I was working for churches doing music and promoting contemporary Christian music concerts with the biggest names in that industry. Into the 90s, I became manager to national acts touring around the world — which caused me to put my horns in the closet for about 10 years. By 1999, I just wanted to play music again, and I answered that ad to join Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns.

Obviously, this telling is the very short version of that 23-year experience, and what became such a significant part of my life. There were hard times and bad times, but mostly wonderful times with all the guys and gals I was honored to perform with. We played for near-empty rooms and for as many as 40,000 at festivals. We shared the stage with famous artists and many of the best local musicians and bands. I will always cherish every moment.

BCS Express in Cary, NC - 2013

I want to express my heartfelt thanks and admiration to all the fantastic musicians who made those 23 years unforgettable. And to the fans who continued to show up for our infrequent club shows in the last couple of years. Many who’d been coming to see us for over 20 years!

At our final Durham show on December 8, I stepped off the stage a few times just to watch and soak it in. After the last song, and when we began the final tear-down and load-out of the gear, one of the guys said to me, “You know you’re going to miss this.”

Yes . . . I am.

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Brief Summary of My Personal January 6 Story Timeline (Then ’til Now)
Mainly For Newer Followers, Not Yet Up-to-Speed on My Work

A more detailed account of my day on January 6, 2021, can be found here:


-On Dec. 21, 2020 — two days after Trump announced his own "wild" J6 rally at The Ellipse in D.C. — I posted this announcement to my social media accounts:

“Regardless of how you feel about the election results, this might be a spectacle worth observing up close and personal. (I'm predisposed to believe this crowd will not riot, loot, and burn the city.) I might begin my northeast run on this date, in DC. Anyone else going? #tpcroadtrip2021”

Well . . . they didn't "burn the city."


-In my email newsletter that went out on January 4, 2021, I made the following comment:

“I am headed to DC on Wednesday. Why? Not because I think a crowd of any size is going to force government into a real investigation of the election results, but because the “powers that be” on all sides of the political equation need to see WE THE PEOPLE in force, letting them know that WE ARE WATCHING. WE are engaged! WE are not going to lay down to any level of tyranny — whether it comes from the right or the left, the Democrats or the GOP. I’m also hoping to document on video anything “special” that might happen, and perhaps get a few interviews from a variety of voices.”

-By “special” . . . it was rumored there would be some big announcement on the election controversy, (a release of The Kraken, maybe), about which I hoped to get comments from members of the crowd. There was nothing special announced from the stage, by Trump or any of the others. The “special” came later . . . unexpectedly.


-I arrived at the Washington Monument at about 9:30 am on January 6, and spent the next three hours watching the crowd grow to an enormous size — documenting it on video.

-Trump took the stage almost an hour later than announced, at 11:57 pm. His “warm-up” acts were ‘meh,’ and his speech was equally ‘meh.’ Because of the cold, windy conditions, the poor audio, and wanting to get ahead of the throng that was scheduled to march on the Capitol for the other events, I left the Washington Monument lawn about halfway through Trump’s speech and began a brisk walk toward the Capitol Building . . . along with thousands of others already peeling off from Trump's speech.

-I arrived at the Reflection Pool on the west side of the Capitol at about 1:15 pm, where I was hearing police sirens and what sounded like explosions. From there, I could see smoke and the arrival of DC Metro PD (MPD) units pouring down the steps toward the west terrace. I made the decision to sprint up to the terrace, where I turned on my camera at 1:19 pm, and for almost an hour filmed the violence and surging crowds in that area.

-Just after 2:00 pm I began to notice signs of Capitol Police (USCP) withdrawal. Shortly thereafter, there was a sudden surge of protestors up the stairs underneath the scaffolding on the northwest side of the terrace. Hundreds of protestors were now in unrestricted movement up those stairs, so I followed.

-At approximately 2:21 pm I followed hundreds of protestors through what some call the “Senate Wing door.” This, I would later learn, was the site of the first breach of the building. I did not see the breach, as it occurred at approximately 2:13 pm, while I was still on the lower terrace.

-For almost 40 minutes I captured scenes inside the Capitol Building, before exiting at about 2:59 pm, at the exact location where FBI tactical unit medics were trying to save Ashli Babbit’s life. Just over one minute after I exited through the South door, I filmed Babbitt’s extraction through that doorway, while the D.C. Fire EMT crew still worked feverishly on her lifeless body.

Screenshot from my video - January 6, 2021 - of Ashli Babbitt being evacuated from
the Capitol Building by D.C. Fire Department emergency medical techs.

-Shortly thereafter, I gave a couple of interviews to local media, found a restroom and a sandwich, then returned to the Capitol to witness the arrival of the Army and Air Force National Guards finalize the clearing of the entire Capitol grounds. I then returned to my hotel in Arlington sometime after 7:30 pm.


-For the next five days I began frame by frame review of my videos, and then started writing my first story about the event, which was posted on January 13, 2021:

-On February 24, 2021, I published my second story about J6:

-As I’ve pointed out many times, I got a few things wrong in my earliest analyses. I’ve tried to correct those over the following months and years as new evidence has presented itself. But, those two articles remain as written — errors included.


-Because I engaged in no violence, property damage, chanting, singing, carried no flags, and wore no political messages on my clothing . . . as the months wore on I began to think maybe I was going to have the same respect as so many other journalists who were not being rounded up in the J6 dragnet. But, on the morning of July 22, 2021, I received a phone call from FBI Special Agent Gerrit Doss. After he asked me for a voluntary interview, I immediately turned that over to my local attorney, and they worked together with all our schedules to arrange a date for the interview.

-The first attempt at scheduling the FBI interview was aborted on-site, on the morning of August 5, 2021. The reason given — after my attorney and I had already arrived at their Cary, NC filed office — was that they could not interview me, “because of my press status,” until after they received a letter of approval from the U.S. Attorney General’s office.

-My attorney worked with an assistant USAG, they negotiated a proffer agreement for the interview, and it was rescheduled for October 18, 2021. I was interviewed for two full hours, under the agreement that nothing I said in the interview could be used against me — should charges be made against me — in court . . . unless I perjured myself. (That didn’t happen.)

-On November 17, 2021, my attorney received an email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Anita Eve — out of Philadelphia — stating, “Your client will be charged within the week.”

-On Monday morning of Thanksgiving week — November 22, 2021 — we sent out approximately 200 press releases to all manner of media sources, stating that I — an independent journalist — was about to be prosecuted for nothing more than the act of “journalism” on January 6.

-At approximately 1:00 pm that same day, AUSA Eve sent my attorney a copy of that press release, stating, “We’re not happy about this.” He responded, asking, “Are you saying my client should forego his 1st Amendment right because he is being persecuted by the federal government?" There were a couple of other exchanges between my attorney and the AUSA before she went silent. I assumed that was because of the Thanksgiving holiday.

-My phone began to ring from interested media sources, wishing to cover my story.

-On Tuesday evening — November 23 — I received a call from Senator Ron Johnson (WI), asking me how he could help. As the minority leader of a Senate J6 investigative committee, he put me in touch with his investigators.

-On Wednesday morning — November 24 — I was contacted by an attorney who practices criminal law in D.C., who happened to be a federal prosecutor for more than 20 years. After a three-hour phone call, I engaged his services.

-On Monday — November 29 — my new attorney reached out to AUSA Eve by both email and phone, and she never responded. We never heard from her or the FBI again . . . until yesterday — August 5, 2023 — more than 20 months later, when my Raleigh attorney received a call from the FBI notifying him that they had “service of process” for me.

-This turns out to be a Grand Jury subpoena, requesting my January 6 videos. My attorney received that on Monday. We have been able to determine the DOJ has reopened its investigation into my January 6 activities. I volunteered to give those to the FBI during my interview in October of ’21, but they never followed up and requested them. The most unfortunate fact is . . . grand juries are not convened to investigate misdemeanor crimes. For unknown reasons, they are apparently considering a felony recommendation to the grand jury. As of this writing, that is all we know.


-Since January 6, 2021, as well as the time since my threatened prosecution, I have been very active in investigating many aspects related to January 6. Something I never expected to be engaged in. I have broken original stories, developed Capitol Police whistleblowers, met with Congress Members, and engaged with congressional staffers and investigators. All of that has been well documented in my blogs.

-In the fall of 2022, I covered every day of the first, nine-week-long Oath Keepers trial, at the District Courthouse in D.C.

-I’ve been interviewed for my work by innumerable media sources — large and small — from Tucker Carlson on Fox News, to reporters with both NBC and the New York Times, to smaller podcasters. I’ve also collaborated on several stories with The Epoch Times, and have been one of a small hand full of journalists who’ve been given access to that “41,000 hours of J6 video” by Speaker McCarthy’s staff. I am just now entering into a “contributor” relationship with Blaze Media.


As I said in the beginning, this is an abbreviated overview of my personal “January 6 story.” I have no idea what the government’s renewed interest is in me or my videos. The only “crime” I committed on January 6 — technically speaking — is to have entered a restricted building. But, so did some 80 to 100 other journalists who have not been charged with any crimes. We all simply followed the story where the story went that day.

It would be easy to speculate that I might be being singled out because I haven’t conformed to the “preferred narrative,” or because of the sensitivity of certain stories I’m currently working on. I simply have no idea, so can’t really go there. Not at least until I see the subpoena on Monday, and we can get some questions answered about the status of my case . . . which went from “Your client will be charged within the week” to total silence from the DOJ for more than a year and a half.

Some say there are “no coincidences” in this particular game . . . but we’ll know more on Monday.

Stay tuned . . .


P.S. I have no idea what they're looking for in my videos. What's so special, that it requires a Grand Jury subpoena? All the good stuff is already posted online:



Read full Article
post photo preview
Tweetstorm Rollout on Secret U.S. Army SpecOps Deployed on January 6
Having no name, this top secret group is referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange”

THREAD: Two and 1/2 years ago, in my 2nd article about #Jan6, (Feb. 24, 2021), I revealed a “very high probability that both [Army] ’Special Forces’ operatives and U.S. Marshalls were mixed in with the crowd that entered the Capitol Building.”


10 months later (Jan. 3, 2022) Newsweek confirmed my sourcing with a story headlined, “Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol.” saying, “The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown.”


I have quietly investigated this discovery ever since and eventually revealed my knowledge of a SpecOps group deployed on J6 to be a top-secret SIGINT group from Ft. Belvoir, just outside D.C. (I have no info if this is the same group Newsweek reported.)


I have long been aware of a current member of this “unit” deployed to the Capitol on J6. Late in 2022, I was introduced to a retired member of the same SpecOps group. In short, he was highly impressed with my knowledge of that unit, as they officially . . . “do not exist.”


They may not officially “exist,” but in 2007, British author @MickWSmith revealed the existence and history of this U.S. Army SpecOps group in his book, “Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team”

Unlike the SEALS or Delta Force, this secretive Army team does not have a name. Only their specific operations are given a name, and they are otherwise generally referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange.”


My source, who is a retired member of “the unit” does not believe his former group could possibly have been used for any purpose on J6, as it is outside the operational protocols of their mission. Namely, when he was a member, they would never be used for domestic operations.


Also, he says they would never have been “seconded” to @FBI. They have a specific chain of command within the Army hierarchy and are only ever seconded to the CIA in overseas ops. That said, he has been retired from “the unit” for almost a decade.


In my recent interactions with congressional members and staff, I have been informed that they are aware the “the unit” was operational in some capacity on J6, but have been unable to get answers from @DeptofDefense, specifically because they “do not officially exist.”


In recent weeks, trying to get more information, I’ve read another team of special ‘intel’ investigators into my research on this subject. Our most recent discovery is that they have been able to identify another current member of “the unit” who was at the Capitol on J6.


Before I go any further in this narrative, I'll emphasize that I've never implied “the unit” was deployed on J6 for nefarious purposes. In my 1st story, I theorized that they were simply there to “take care of business” should protestors get out of hand, using lethal weapons.


That established, their presence and deployment raises serious questions. Why are military forces being deployed in violation of posse comitatus law? Is it common practice for @DeptofDefense to allow military SpecOps to be used at domestic protest events?


More importantly, if this is not common, and was a one-off operation . . . having “the unit” seconded to @FBI on J6 . . . WHY? What did they know, requiring “the unit's” presence at the Capitol, and what was “the unit’s” “posture” on J6?


We are seeking more information, and answers to those questions, but do not expect to receive those directly from @FBI, @CapitolPolice, (if they even knew), or from @DeptofDefense. But, you may be asking why I’m talking about this without having all the facts nailed down.


My @FBI whistleblowing friends, @KyleSeraphin and @RealStevefriend have advised me that “daylight” is not only the “best disinfectant,” but also the best “protection” when one is hovering this close over the target. 


I don’t have the same covering as that afforded a reliable MSM journalist - as when @FBI had Newsweek’s @warkin release a one-year anniversary CYA story about their deployment of every 3-letter agencies’ tactical teams and military commandos with “shoot to kill” orders on J6.


So . . . I’m letting @FBI and @DeptofDefense know that I’ve now read three other friendly journalists, a team of think tank investigators, and several congressional staffers into the details of this story. “Whacking” me, to stop my work, will probably be counterproductive.


But, they are welcome to reach out to me and answer my questions. (I also have more.) I’m certain they already have my number. 

Stay tuned. More on this, and even more important J6 stories are in the pipeline. 


On Twitter, (or, X):

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals