Steve Baker - TPC
News • Politics • Writing
Steve's Unedited Tweetstorm from Day 11 of Oath Keepers Trial
October 19, 2022
post photo preview

Day 11 of Oath Keepers Trial

Judge Mehta arrives at 9:08am . . . morning housekeeping begins . . . 

Woodward first up to object to upcoming videos taken by Caldwell early on J6. Nestler jumps up to podium to argue their admissibility. Woodward then offers up additional video to put gov’s presentation in context. Woodward argues that much of the inflammatory language in crowd noise is not associated with OK’s speech, and therefore prejudicial. Nestler argues that their transcripts endeavors to parse out Caldwell’s, Meggs’ and other OK’s specific speech, and leave out that of unknown crowd members. Now they are haggling over specific photograph which we can’t see in media room. Mehta’s basic comments seems to incline toward admissibility, but that he will review relevant case law before presentation. More objections to authentication of video from Kellye Sorrell. Nestler once agains brings up previous stipulations and that this is the first time they’ve heard of these objections. Exactly 20 minutes into this haggling and Mehta is being surprisingly patient and good humored…

…Now 30 minutes into this evidence debate between Woodward and Nestler, and Mehta yet remains calm. And it continues . . . 

——

Geyer approaches podium with pointed complaints about just last night discovery items from government - he’d requested since January of this year . . . <objection> . . . Mehta immediately goes to sidebar . . . but then on open mic references the media room screw-up last week, in which we heard an ‘under seal session’ - and he directs the techies to be sure we can’t hear what’s going on. 

Mehta then leaves the courtroom, to speak with jury.

——

Judge Mehta returns at 9:54am, and mentions jury is arriving from a more distant location in the building. (I assume COVID rapid-testing, again?) He asks if Dolan (witness) is ready. Jury enters the room at 9:56am.

Dolan takes stand and Linder - for Rhodes - begins cross-exam.

——

Linder has Dolan verify that they went back to hotel before curfew, and that there was no conversations of OKs going back into the District on the following morning. Confirmation of already known details about not bringing firearms into DC . . . when they loaded up the next morning . . . driving back to Florida with Harrelson and Cummings in his car. Also, verifies that there were no conversations about getting back to Florida, “reloading” and heading back to DC for battle. Subdued ride back to FL, with very little conversation between the three of them. Dolan confirms he wasn’t arrested until late May of ’21, then describes the details of arrest, and that he’d had no contact from Law enforcement before arrest.

Linder: “How many times have you had conversations with agents of the government before your testimony yesterday?”

Dolan: “Maybe 4 times.”

Dolan acknowledges that he eventually entered a plea to two of the five original charges against him. He confirms that he’s expecting to be sentenced to between 5-7 years in prison as part of his plea. Linder begins showing him examples of sentencing guidelines, enhancements, etc., and his discussions with his lawyer about potential sentencing if he took deal vs. if he lost at trial.

Linder: “Is part of your plea agreement, that you’d cooperate with government?”

Dolan: “Yes.”

Linder: “If you refused to cooperate . . . or changed your mind after receiving deal . . . do you have an understanding of what could happen to you?”

Dolan: “I suppose it could be worse . . . “ (sentencing)

Linder: “Do you believe that if you cooperate, you could get a lower sentence?”

Dolan “I believe there’s a chance.”

——

Linder now begins reviewing Dolan’s service, work, health history . . . and substance abuse issues. Dolan admits to using alcohol as a pain reliever following his hip surgery. Linder explores his early relationship with the OKs, and how they gave him a sense of purpose - similar to his days in the Marines - and he was very impressed with the similar military backgrounds of other members. Liked that they offered hurricane relief services, as well as offering personal protection Services for various VIPs.

Linder asks him many questions about the specifics of his understanding about firearms laws in both FL and DC. 

Linder: “Was it your understanding that members of the OKs were trying to follow the law.” (with regards to firearms)

Dolan: “Yes”

Linder: “Did you try and follow the law?”

Dolan: “Yes”

More discussion about care taken not to violate DC gun laws, and after dropping off luggage at hotel in DC, they immediately left for security details in DC on the evening of Jan 5. Dolan has no memory of the exact people he was providing PSD. “I didn’t know those people, anyway.”

More discussions about adhering to DC firearms laws - under direction of OK leadership - on the day of the 6th. Did Dolan participate in PSD on the 6th? “Yes.” Was he aware there were as many as 7 other OK group providing PSD services that day. “Not aware.”

Discussion into his understanding of the Insurrection Act . . . what happens if Trump invoked Act . . . his understanding that there was no other justifications discussed by any OKs on Signal or otherwise, that weapons could be brought into the Capitol, unless Trump evoked IA.

Questions about Dolan’s PSD duties that day. Only aware of his obligation to the Stop the Steal VIPs. Eventually, his charges disappeared into the crowd, and only then moved toward and up the stairs of east side of Capitol until the crowd surged that direction. Quick review of the rest of his day.

Linder: “At the end of the day, after Trump had not invoked the Insurrection Act, what did you do?”

Dolan: “Went back to the hotel.”

Linder yields cross to Juli Haller - for Meggs . . . 

Haller shortly reviews his service history, and asks him about possible PTSD, depression, and about whether he’d ever sought help for alcoholism. Dolan says he’s never been clinically diagnosed with PTSD or depression, and had never sought help or counseling for alcohol abuse.

——

Mehta calls morning break before Haller gets into meat of her cross (10:41) . . . 

. . . Mehta back in courtroom at 10:52 and immediately calls sidebar before re-seating jury.  

——

(INSIDER NOTE: there's concern among attorneys not to push Dolan too hard. Even his co-defendants believe he might even be suicidal. If defense attorneys push too hard, and breaks down on stand, he could then become a sympathetic witness in the jurors' mind.)

——

At 10:59 Mehta announces another “under seal” session and clears the courtroom of all but legal teams, defendants, and court officials. <I assume our media room feed will get cut this time> . . . 

Then, Mehta steps out of courtroom to speak to someone . . . <Mehta, Man of Mystery> . . . Mehta is back . . . but he’s just sitting there silently. No idea what he’s waiting on . . . and we still have video feed in media room.

NOW we know reason for his silence . . . the courtroom tech came down to media room to make sure we were CUT OFF from this ‘sealed session,’ manually. He tells us they no longer trust the 'off' button in court room. (We go dark at 11:05am)

——

Court tech returns to media room at 11:30 to put us back online. Jury re-seated and Dolan recalled to witness stand. Haller resumes cross . . . 

——

Haller questions about Dolan’s activities while inside Capitol. Didn’t enter House or Senate chambers, didn’t break anything.

She questions him about a photo taken of PSD he did for Roger Stone in Dec. of ’20, at a Miami event. He is very hesitant to identify most in photo, except for Stone. This is where he met Meggs. He didn’t meet Harrelson until they drove from FL to DC. 

Dolan has a propensity for not having a very good memory for names, dates, times, discussions, faces, what photos he took, etc.

Haller: “Yesterday, you discussed that “10,000 is an army, but the most OKs you ever saw gathered was only about 25?”

Dolan: “That was the most I ever saw on a chat.”

(Can’t tell if Dolan is being evasive, genuinely can’t remember what he said yesterday, or Haller doesn’t effectively pose the question.)

Dolan, over and over: “If you say so.” “If you say it is.” Even when asked to verify photos from his own camera phone. Haller presenting his own photos from VIP area at The Ellipse on morning of J6. He recalls and identifies a photo he took of Alex Jones, inside the VIP area. Including a selfie with AJ in the background.

(PERSONAL COMMENT: Does Haller think the Alex Jones photos makes him look like a conspiracy kook, someone with special VIP access to celebrity, or . . . (?) . . . does she think showing AJ helps her client’s case in front of THIS jury?)

More photos of OKs inside VIP areas at Ellipse. Haller seems to be establishing the overall legitimacy of the OKs mission that day, and their most-favored status as recognized VIPs, themselves. Dolan is simply authenticating.

——

Haller begins questioning about  his time on Capitol grounds with Harrelson, and if he recalls a discussion with him about whether or not they should enter the Capitol. Dolan recalls no such discussion.

Haller begins showing Dolan a video, in which he hears a voice saying “I think we should go,” while they are still in grassy areas far from Capitol steps. (Another voice says, “Huh?” The “huh” was Harrelson, but not identified during this questioning. It is video I have personally previously seen and heard.)

Showing another photo of his from up on a pedestal. Questions and affirmations about singing National Anthem, chanting “USA, USA,” and that it “felt like a rally.” Dolan then confirms from another video his identity on the Capitol steps. 

Haller shows video of Dolan’s position on Capitol steps much lower than most of the crowd already pressed against the door and building. Shows additional video of arrival of next group of OKs. Video shows door closed when they arrived, and then opening substantially ahead of their arrival and with a bunch of people between them and the door. Haller has him confirm that he doesn’t know any of the other non-OKs in that crowd, and that also from his vantage point he can see no police officers as the crowd ahead of them begins surging through the open door.

Dolan reconfirms that once he was in Capitol, he had no physical contact with LEOs and damaged no property. He only chanted and took video.

Haller brings back the previous photo of OKs standing in front of officer Harry Dunn - taken by Dolan - they are in a line between Dunn and the protestors. Dolan confirms that they were protecting Dunn from the protestors, and that Harrelson had verbally assured Dunn that he was in no danger from them.

(NOTE: “Officer Harry Dunn” is not identified by name in that exchange.  Only as “the officer.” I’m just personally familiar with this event and the characters involved.)

***I'm later told that Haller DID mention Dunn's name.***

——

Haller concludes with last round of questions, including asking Dolan:

-If he ever heard that trump invoked the insurrection act? NO

-Did he go back to his hotel in VA to retrieve guns and then return to Capitol? NO

-Did he ever have any discussions with Meggs or other OKs, either in chat or in person, about planning for violent or forceful entry into the Capitol or of overthrowing the government? NO

Judge Mehta calls for lunch break at 12:35. (Back at 1:35) . . . 

——

Mehta returns to courtroom following lunch at 1:43pm . . . jury back . . . Dolan returns to witness stand.

Haller hands off cross to Geyer - for Harrelson -  . . . 

Geyer asks Dolan if it was on January 3rd or 4th that he first learned Harrelson was going to DC. Dolan doesn’t remember whether he first picked up Cummings or Harrelson in rental van before leaving for their overnight in NC on the 4th.

Dolan confirms that he was on duty to watch over event speakers on the evening of the 5th. Looking for anybody that might try to go after the speakers. “There was a lot of talk about Antifa.”

After security detail, Dolan and Harrelson bought a couple six-packs, and did not attend a security planning meeting that was in the hotel that night. 

Morning of the 6th neither Harrelson or Dolan wore heavy protective gear to the rally at The Ellipse. 

Geyer: “Was it made clear it was okay to bring mace . . . to protect you against attackers, or to protect your protectees from attackers?”

Dolan: “Yes.”

Geyer takes Dolan through discussion about his assignment to escort VIP event speakers from Ellipse to the scheduled events at the Capitol area. Geyer shows Dolan a map of the Capitol area. Dolan doesn’t recall seeing or not seeing the map. “It’s possible I saw it.” (Map contains names of the lost of protectees. And Dolan only recognizes two of them.)

Geyer brings back the time-synched four-panel video showing the movements of Harrelson, Dolan and VIPs in the walk toward the Capitol. Dolan identifies himself in the video, and also confirms that it is a PSD he is leading. Also identifies Harrelson behind the VIPs.

Geyer: “You’re headed to where the stages are suppose to be, correct?”

Dolan: “If they were to be behind the Capitol, yes.”

Dolan acknowledges a couple other OKs with them, but doesn’t remember their names. Can’t personally remember the names of any of the VIPs.

Geyer: “Are you thinking about disrupting the certification of the college while you were standing there? [with VIPS]

Dolan: “No”

——

Geyer reminds Dolan he had a recollection of receiving a text that the capitol had been breached this moment (1:53pm). Geyer points out that did not actually happen until 2:12. Geyer asks him again if he and Harrelson were thinking about attacking the Capitol or police officers. Dolan confirms they were only looking for where the stage was suppose to be, and doing no plotting against the Capitol - just standing around and chatting.

Dolan acknowledges he had no idea of the layout of the Capitol, or which direction they were even escorting the VIPs. Also acknowledges he had no idea what was about to happen. Geyer asks him to let him know at what point in the video when he first “realized something was amiss?”

Mehta interrupts and asks Geyer to “move on . . . I’m not exactly sure of what the relevance of this is. Let’s go to the next topic.”

Geyer is now showing the first moment provocateurs are pushing through the east side baike rack barriers, and asks if Dolan knew what was happening from his vantage point quite some distance away. While Geyer is making the point that at the moment the barriers were being breached, Dolan lights a cigarette . . . 

Mehta interrupts and calls for a sidebar . . . 

Geyer is allowed to proceed.

***IMPORTANT:media room journos break out laughing their asses off when Geyer asks Dolan to let him know when “sees something amiss”., and reporter exclaims in room: “I can tell you what’s amiss!” - the most blatant sarcastic eruption in the media room thus far in the trial . . . totally missing the point Geyer is making point that Dolan has NO PART and No AWARENESS of the Capitol barricades being breached. They don’t even understand why Geyer is being allowed to proceed. Mehta is impatient . . . but allowing to this continue . . . he sees it.***

——-

Dolan acknowledges he had no awareness the barriers had come down.

New video:

“They’re storming the fucking Capitol building, whooptie-fucking do.” -Harrelson’s voice

“We should go up there.” -Dolan’s voice

“Huh?” -Harrelson

Geyer gets Dolan to acknowledge they had no knowledge or intent this would happen, and that Harrelson said, ”They’re storming . . .” Not, “We’re . . .”

Geyer is showing new video of their approach and ascension of the steps, as well as beginning to point out other unidentified individuals in their presence. (Geyer is treading on dangerous ground . . . and Mehta’s already demonstrated resistance to hints of “unindicted conspirators” . . . but Mehta still allows this to continue.)

Geyer continues to take Dolan through the video of their ascension up the stairs, and the arrival of the other Oath Keepers join them. <Mehta interrupts Geyer and tells him to move forward. “The court knows the point you’re trying to make, and jury knows the point you’re trying to make. Let’s move on.”>

(Geyer is testing Mehta’s patience . . . and tells Geyer to stop trying to identify people Dolan doesn’t know, and if he doesn’t move on, he’ll make him sit down.)

Geyer: “Did you think you were being let in to the Capitol?”

Dolan: “I don’t think I was contemplating that at all. I was just taking pictures and video. That’s all.”

Geyer hands cross off to Crisp - for Watkins  . . . 

——

Crisp begins taking Dolan through a series of technical military command structure and communication questions that he understands as a 20 year Marine vet. (Staff Sgt)

He has Dolan acknowledge that he basically received nothing similar from OK leadership in mission planning or direct comms or briefing leading up to or on Jan 4, 5, 6 . . . and certainly nothing discussing a purposeful attack on the Capitol.

Dolan acknowledges that he didn’t even have his phone on (in airline mode) all day on 6th, and wouldn’t have been able to receive and command orders or instructions. Didn’t even turn it on until he tried to call his wife, [just before 2pm]

[No more questions.” Crisp is done . . . Mehta calls for afternoon break at 3:02pm

——

Back from break at 3:18pm

Redirect of Dolan begins, by AUSA Nestler.

Nestler has Dolan confirm his VIP pass only allowed access to Ellipse VIP area, and not into the Capitol.

Nestler asks why Dolan deleted the photos he took inside Capitol, but not the ones at Rally earlier in the day. “Because I was scared. I wasn’t suppose to be there.”

Nestler asks when he was chanting “Treason,” for who was that intended: “Congress”

Nestler shows video and asks if crowd pushing into Capitol was peaceful. Dolan declined to characterizes everyones intentions.

Nestler asks why Dolan went into building. Dolan responds that he wanted Congress to know that - along with this many people - they could let them know they weren’t going to take the election results “laying down.”

Nestler tries to draw Dolan into saying the messages and chats seemed real enough to think that the language insinuated implied a desire of OK leadership to do more than just PSDs. 

There are multiple objections . . . and Nestler volunteers to rephrase.

Nestler goes back to old message slides to remind Dolan of the kind of bravado language he’d previously heard and acknowledged from other OKs. Reminded him that he’d said, “he thought if Trump didn’t act, he might have to . . .”

Objection . . . sidebar . . . 

(Side note: Dolan is markedly less comfortable and hesitant with Nestler now, during redirect, than he was during direct.)

“Objection overruled”

Nestler: “What did you understand the general message to mean . . . “

Dolan: “If the president didn’t act, and we needed to . . . we were up there, on location  . . . we would do something . . . the Capitol doors opened, and I went in screaming TRAITOR.”

More message slides . . . and Nestler gets Dolan back “on original message”

No further questions. Dolan dismissed.

——

United States calls Thomas Wickham. Formerly the parliamentarian for US House of Reps.(Retired) Worked for House in January of 2021.

Wickham taking question about legal transfer  of power from one president to the next, and begins reading from Article 2 of Constitution. Then reads 20th Amendment.

Media does not select presidential nominee. ‘That’s just information.” They continue describing the legal process of how Electors vote, when and where their votes are to be sent. And who is to count those Electoral votes, where and when. (Jan 6 after meeting and vote of Electors.)

<History and Constitution lesson proceeds on how we technically elect presidents> . . . 

——

Gov. begins showing video compilation of when Congress became aware of the disruptions on J6, the evacuation notices, scenes of Congress peeps being led out . . . all of this with timestamp and overlay of the official written congressional record. Then shows actual Electors ballots being carried out of House. Then Pence ceremonial duties being interrupted and him led away.

The proceedings here are now simply a detailed recounting of what took place in and with Congress that day - the official response -  how they sheltered - how they behaved - etc., etc. Eventually video of protestors entering Senate chamber, then being cleared by police.

Fast forward to videos of Congress AFTER 8pm that night, and their eventual return to the certification process, late in the evening of January 6, all the way until after 3am on the morning of the 7th.

Then slides of Pelosi and Pence presiding over respective chambers before Congress was interrupted. 

No further questions.

——

Fischer - for Caldwell - begins cross . . .  more constitutional lessons, as specifically applied to the transfer of power. Fischer is arguing she technicalities of the transfer . . . and not sure where he’s going . . . or why.

Tarpley - for Rhodes - takes over cross . . . asking question about specificity of Electoral Count Act. Then Tarpley begins asking about the Objections to the certification that were offered during joint session on the 6th.

Tarpley is asking Wickham to confirm how the objections are to be handled, what the substance of the actual objections were that day? What are the time limits in confirming the counting. (four days, apparently)

“Was there ever any doubt in your mind that Congress would conclude the counting?”

(Multiple objections follow. Mehta chastens Tarpley to move on, and says, “I’m giving you some rope, but . . . “)

——

Woodward take over cross . . . opens with two straight sustained objections . . .

Mehta steps in once again, and tells Woodward that he has “anything relevant to this case, ask them.”

Woodward steps down . . . Geyer comes forward for cross . . . begins by asking questions about congressional security . . . 

(NOTE: I get the impression the defense is playing “four corners” right now.)

Mehta now stops Geyer and tells him the witness is not qualified to answer his questions.

Geyer steps down . . . and Nestler begins redirect.

Nestler asks when the vote was finally certified. “Around 4am the next day.”

No further questions.

——

Mehta dismisses jury at 4:54pm

Nestler gives court heads up that tomorrow is going to be a long and intense day of presentation from their next witness, FBI Agent who will focus entirely on events, videos, and messages from January 6th. He anticipates the government presentation will be about 3.5 hours, and that all defense attorneys will want long cross exams.

All done for the day.

community logo
Join the Steve Baker - TPC Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
When Dems speak to me with their outside voice

Dem poll greeter in Western NC expresses her frustrations with FEMA to me and then says, “I’m kinda discouraged to see the number of Latinos and young people that are voting for the Republicans.”

Enjoy!

00:02:02
Friday morning!

In-depth and, at times, explosive interview with @KyleSeraphin drops on @BlazeTV and http://youtube.com/@BlazeNewsTonight tomorrow morning.

00:01:59
Why doesn't the Secret Service record their radio comms?
00:01:07
TNN Live This Morning

This was an interesting - and primarily non-J6-related - discussion with Dan Newman this morning. We spent quite a bit of time discussing this new "weaponization of rape as a tool of war" in the Hamas/Israel conflict. We also cover a couple of other things, including a teaser of something else I'm going to be looking at in my upcoming visit to the Capitol CCTV viewing room.

TNN Live This Morning
TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman

Dan and I spent quite a bit of time today discussing the coming 'Big Story," as well as the recent Stephen Horn case and conviction.

TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman
This Morning on TNN Live!

If you haven't noticed, this is a pretty big news day, and Dan and I get into a lot of it. Definitely worth a listen. I especially express my frustrations with the do-nothing GOP, when so much CAN be done right now, about so MUCH that is going on.

This Morning on TNN Live!

I’m hoping someone in this community can help me. I was violently assaulted in a bathroom in Macon, GA in December of 2021. After informing the CEO of my company they were violating labor law I was sent to Macon, GA to do someone else’s work. While there a patron followed me to the bathroom and hit me with something hard enough to shatter my jaw on the left side into several pieces and completely fracture my jawbone on the right side. I woke up in an ambulance on the way to the hospital. And despite bleeding from my mouth and with bruises on my face consistent with blunt force trauma the ER did an x-ray of my chest and put me back in the waiting room. After waiting for hours without being seen, and not knowing the extent of my injuries, I got an Uber back to the hotel where I was staying. I worked for two more days and then came home. I went to the VA hospital where they did a CT scan and transferred me to Duke University hospital where I had a plate installed on each side of my face and had my jaws wired ...

It's Friday.., and it's not cynical...

February 20, 2025

Steve probably already knows about this, but since his story is my story - I quit FB when they suppressed his channel, and followed him everywhere until he abandoned us like an Elon babymama - I hope he submits it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/big-tech-censorship-ftc-chairman-announces-investigation-asks/

post photo preview
Bull City Syndicate - 23 Years, and Done
New beginnings and the end of an era as I retire my bands

On December 8, 2023, Bull City Syndicate (BCS) played its final show. We went out with a bang, performing a top-shelf corporate holiday event to 700 enthusiastic attendees. Appropriately, in the city of the band’s birth — Durham, NC — The Bull City. I considered booking a final public show, but after much thought, I decided to retire the band in a more low-key, less public manner. 

In November of 2000, I answered an ad from an established local band then known as Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns. (SK) I’d spent a year getting my trumpet chops back into shape after a decade in the music business, managing other artists. I did not intend to do anything in SK other than return to my first love: just playing the trumpet. I didn’t want to manage the band and certainly had no interest in ownership. I just wanted to play again. Money didn’t matter. And in those days, even as one of the premier club bands in the Raleigh/Durham market, my share of earnings from a 9-piece horn band rarely covered my bar tab.

For many months after joining Soul Kitchen, I managed to avoid being involved in the business of the band. When asked by band members what I did for a living, I always lied and gave them a different story each time. (I remember once telling them I was in the CIA. Ha!) Finally, after a Sunday night rehearsal, drinking and smoking on the back deck of our original drummer’s house (Dave Wilkins), Dave suddenly demanded, “Baker. What the f—k do you do for a living?”

“You really want to know?”

“Yes!”

“I manage bands for a living.”

“WHAT!? Why don’t you manage this band?”

“I don’t want to. I just want to play trumpet.”

At the next week’s rehearsal, Dave handed me a manilla folder that represented the totality of the band’s “business.”

“You’re in charge now,” said Dave. 

(Sigh.)

Bull City Syndicate opening for Eddie Money in 2008

From that point forward, things began to change quickly for SK. First began a radical updating of our set list designed to draw more people to our shows and more dollars for the band. I began to pursue more private events and larger public shows. Some of the original band members were not happy about the extra demands and work required to make the move from a fun club band to a serious special event band, and we began to replace members. With the band growing in popularity, we were able to attract even more versatile and better-trained musicians. We went from being a really good band to a great "horn band," packing out every live performance and fielding requests for those higher-paying private events.

We then began to spin off a few side projects. The first of those was our pop-jazz 4-piece called Cafe Mars. Then, in 2006, we launched an aggressive recording project led by award-winning local producer John Custer. After six months in the studio, “You Make Me Feel” was released in 2007. An album paying tribute to North Carolina songwriters, and for which I’m really proud of the final product. Especially the original tunes written for the album by Custer himself. It was because of that album that Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns became Bull City Syndicate. (There were 17 other bands named Soul Kitchen at the time, and with an album containing original music, we didn’t want to deal with any trademark issues.)

Durham Herald Sun Magazine feature in 2008

When the economy began to tank in the summer of 2008 and into 2009, so many local music venues didn’t survive or cut their live music budgets drastically, and private event buyers were forced to hire smaller bands and DJs. Bull City Syndicate made the decision to add a female lead singer to the line-up — as that was a requirement of so many private event and wedding buyers. Our 9-piece “all dude” band became a 10-piece outfit, and the additional female lead remained a feature of the band for its remaining years.

Anyone managing a 10-piece band knows that turnover is going to happen — even when there’s no drama or interpersonal issues. People move away, change jobs, etc. Life happens. But, somewhere around 2010, there was a particular tumult that caused five of our members to leave, and suddenly, with no remaining original members, Bull City Syndicate became “my” band. We were able to fill the missing spots quickly, and the band really took off. No longer led by a “committee,” I was able to take the band to the next level, particularly as a private event and festival band.

Bull City Syndicate Christmas show in Raleigh, NC - 2016

There were many highlights through my time with both incarnations of the band: SK and BCS. My very first gig with SK was an opening date for Kool & The Gang. Our last such brush with greatness was when Dolly Parton joined us onstage performing her classic hit, “Jolene.”

We were honored to be the headlining entertainment for the last two NC Governor’s Inaugural Balls. We performed for some of the largest companies and charities in America: SAS, Glaxo, AT&T, American Heart Association, and too many others to list. We traveled throughout the Mid-Atlantic region for shows — as far north as Maryland and even down to Florida.

Our first spin-off, Cafe Mars, eventually became a 6-piece version of the band called BCS Express. Then, 10 years ago, we added a “yacht rock” version of the band called Captain & The Keels. (C&K) The same line-up as BCS, doing the smooth rock hits from ’75 to ’85, with appropriate foolish costumes.

Captain & The Keels in Hampton, VA - 2016

In 2018 came my most fun spin-off. A David Bowie Tribute act called The American Bowie Experience. (ABX) With that group, we moved our bassist, Randy Ines, over to keys (because of his virtuoso piano chops), and brought my son Duncan in on bass guitar. (Bowie’s son is also named Duncan. Just a coincidence.) Despite the growing popularity and demand for ABX, that band didn’t survive the COVID-19 pandemic after a year and a half of lockdowns. It was everything I could do just to get BCS back to work.

American Bowie Experience at House of Blues in Myrtle Beach, SC - 2019

The aftermath of the pandemic was the beginning of the end for BCS. My life began to change drastically. For more than 25 years I’d been a hobbyist political writer and commentator. My writing chops began to take shape in the early days of the Internet. AOL, Compuserve, and Prodigy eventually became MySpace. MySpace became Facebook, where my online following really began to take off. 

In early 2020 — long after the four versions of the band had become my full-time job and main source of income — “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve” became two months of COVID lockdowns, and none of the band projects were allowed to do live performances. It was then that I decided to monetize my writing “hobby,” moving that to the captain’s seat of my endeavors and BCS and its spinoffs to the co-pilot’s seat. By 2022 and into 2023, my journalistic efforts were being rewarded with significant media attention, and my travels were keeping me away from the band and its needs with increasing frequency. 

In the summer of 2023, I was approached by Dallas-based Blaze Media to become a contributing writer. I was now splitting most of my time between D.C. and Dallas, and the bands’ bookings were suffering. With that came the hard decision that ultimately led me to retire from the BCS and C&K brands, make the total life transition and reinvention to a full-time writer and investigative journalist for The Blaze.

An appearance on The Glenn Beck Show in 2023

I’ve been doing music in one form or the other for over 50 years. At 19 years old, I was traveling the world playing trumpet. In the 80s, I was working for churches doing music and promoting contemporary Christian music concerts with the biggest names in that industry. Into the 90s, I became manager to national acts touring around the world — which caused me to put my horns in the closet for about 10 years. By 1999, I just wanted to play music again, and I answered that ad to join Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns.

Obviously, this telling is the very short version of that 23-year experience, and what became such a significant part of my life. There were hard times and bad times, but mostly wonderful times with all the guys and gals I was honored to perform with. We played for near-empty rooms and for as many as 40,000 at festivals. We shared the stage with famous artists and many of the best local musicians and bands. I will always cherish every moment.

BCS Express in Cary, NC - 2013

I want to express my heartfelt thanks and admiration to all the fantastic musicians who made those 23 years unforgettable. And to the fans who continued to show up for our infrequent club shows in the last couple of years. Many who’d been coming to see us for over 20 years!

At our final Durham show on December 8, I stepped off the stage a few times just to watch and soak it in. After the last song, and when we began the final tear-down and load-out of the gear, one of the guys said to me, “You know you’re going to miss this.”

Yes . . . I am.

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Brief Summary of My Personal January 6 Story Timeline (Then ’til Now)
Mainly For Newer Followers, Not Yet Up-to-Speed on My Work

A more detailed account of my day on January 6, 2021, can be found here:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc


 

-On Dec. 21, 2020 — two days after Trump announced his own "wild" J6 rally at The Ellipse in D.C. — I posted this announcement to my social media accounts:

“Regardless of how you feel about the election results, this might be a spectacle worth observing up close and personal. (I'm predisposed to believe this crowd will not riot, loot, and burn the city.) I might begin my northeast run on this date, in DC. Anyone else going? #tpcroadtrip2021”

Well . . . they didn't "burn the city."

——

-In my email newsletter that went out on January 4, 2021, I made the following comment:

“I am headed to DC on Wednesday. Why? Not because I think a crowd of any size is going to force government into a real investigation of the election results, but because the “powers that be” on all sides of the political equation need to see WE THE PEOPLE in force, letting them know that WE ARE WATCHING. WE are engaged! WE are not going to lay down to any level of tyranny — whether it comes from the right or the left, the Democrats or the GOP. I’m also hoping to document on video anything “special” that might happen, and perhaps get a few interviews from a variety of voices.”

-By “special” . . . it was rumored there would be some big announcement on the election controversy, (a release of The Kraken, maybe), about which I hoped to get comments from members of the crowd. There was nothing special announced from the stage, by Trump or any of the others. The “special” came later . . . unexpectedly.

——

-I arrived at the Washington Monument at about 9:30 am on January 6, and spent the next three hours watching the crowd grow to an enormous size — documenting it on video.

-Trump took the stage almost an hour later than announced, at 11:57 pm. His “warm-up” acts were ‘meh,’ and his speech was equally ‘meh.’ Because of the cold, windy conditions, the poor audio, and wanting to get ahead of the throng that was scheduled to march on the Capitol for the other events, I left the Washington Monument lawn about halfway through Trump’s speech and began a brisk walk toward the Capitol Building . . . along with thousands of others already peeling off from Trump's speech.

-I arrived at the Reflection Pool on the west side of the Capitol at about 1:15 pm, where I was hearing police sirens and what sounded like explosions. From there, I could see smoke and the arrival of DC Metro PD (MPD) units pouring down the steps toward the west terrace. I made the decision to sprint up to the terrace, where I turned on my camera at 1:19 pm, and for almost an hour filmed the violence and surging crowds in that area.

-Just after 2:00 pm I began to notice signs of Capitol Police (USCP) withdrawal. Shortly thereafter, there was a sudden surge of protestors up the stairs underneath the scaffolding on the northwest side of the terrace. Hundreds of protestors were now in unrestricted movement up those stairs, so I followed.

-At approximately 2:21 pm I followed hundreds of protestors through what some call the “Senate Wing door.” This, I would later learn, was the site of the first breach of the building. I did not see the breach, as it occurred at approximately 2:13 pm, while I was still on the lower terrace.

-For almost 40 minutes I captured scenes inside the Capitol Building, before exiting at about 2:59 pm, at the exact location where FBI tactical unit medics were trying to save Ashli Babbit’s life. Just over one minute after I exited through the South door, I filmed Babbitt’s extraction through that doorway, while the D.C. Fire EMT crew still worked feverishly on her lifeless body.

Screenshot from my video - January 6, 2021 - of Ashli Babbitt being evacuated from
the Capitol Building by D.C. Fire Department emergency medical techs.

-Shortly thereafter, I gave a couple of interviews to local media, found a restroom and a sandwich, then returned to the Capitol to witness the arrival of the Army and Air Force National Guards finalize the clearing of the entire Capitol grounds. I then returned to my hotel in Arlington sometime after 7:30 pm.

——

-For the next five days I began frame by frame review of my videos, and then started writing my first story about the event, which was posted on January 13, 2021:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-On February 24, 2021, I published my second story about J6:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-As I’ve pointed out many times, I got a few things wrong in my earliest analyses. I’ve tried to correct those over the following months and years as new evidence has presented itself. But, those two articles remain as written — errors included.

——

-Because I engaged in no violence, property damage, chanting, singing, carried no flags, and wore no political messages on my clothing . . . as the months wore on I began to think maybe I was going to have the same respect as so many other journalists who were not being rounded up in the J6 dragnet. But, on the morning of July 22, 2021, I received a phone call from FBI Special Agent Gerrit Doss. After he asked me for a voluntary interview, I immediately turned that over to my local attorney, and they worked together with all our schedules to arrange a date for the interview.

-The first attempt at scheduling the FBI interview was aborted on-site, on the morning of August 5, 2021. The reason given — after my attorney and I had already arrived at their Cary, NC filed office — was that they could not interview me, “because of my press status,” until after they received a letter of approval from the U.S. Attorney General’s office.

-My attorney worked with an assistant USAG, they negotiated a proffer agreement for the interview, and it was rescheduled for October 18, 2021. I was interviewed for two full hours, under the agreement that nothing I said in the interview could be used against me — should charges be made against me — in court . . . unless I perjured myself. (That didn’t happen.)

-On November 17, 2021, my attorney received an email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Anita Eve — out of Philadelphia — stating, “Your client will be charged within the week.”

-On Monday morning of Thanksgiving week — November 22, 2021 — we sent out approximately 200 press releases to all manner of media sources, stating that I — an independent journalist — was about to be prosecuted for nothing more than the act of “journalism” on January 6.

-At approximately 1:00 pm that same day, AUSA Eve sent my attorney a copy of that press release, stating, “We’re not happy about this.” He responded, asking, “Are you saying my client should forego his 1st Amendment right because he is being persecuted by the federal government?" There were a couple of other exchanges between my attorney and the AUSA before she went silent. I assumed that was because of the Thanksgiving holiday.

-My phone began to ring from interested media sources, wishing to cover my story.

-On Tuesday evening — November 23 — I received a call from Senator Ron Johnson (WI), asking me how he could help. As the minority leader of a Senate J6 investigative committee, he put me in touch with his investigators.

-On Wednesday morning — November 24 — I was contacted by an attorney who practices criminal law in D.C., who happened to be a federal prosecutor for more than 20 years. After a three-hour phone call, I engaged his services.

-On Monday — November 29 — my new attorney reached out to AUSA Eve by both email and phone, and she never responded. We never heard from her or the FBI again . . . until yesterday — August 5, 2023 — more than 20 months later, when my Raleigh attorney received a call from the FBI notifying him that they had “service of process” for me.

-This turns out to be a Grand Jury subpoena, requesting my January 6 videos. My attorney received that on Monday. We have been able to determine the DOJ has reopened its investigation into my January 6 activities. I volunteered to give those to the FBI during my interview in October of ’21, but they never followed up and requested them. The most unfortunate fact is . . . grand juries are not convened to investigate misdemeanor crimes. For unknown reasons, they are apparently considering a felony recommendation to the grand jury. As of this writing, that is all we know.

——

-Since January 6, 2021, as well as the time since my threatened prosecution, I have been very active in investigating many aspects related to January 6. Something I never expected to be engaged in. I have broken original stories, developed Capitol Police whistleblowers, met with Congress Members, and engaged with congressional staffers and investigators. All of that has been well documented in my blogs.

-In the fall of 2022, I covered every day of the first, nine-week-long Oath Keepers trial, at the District Courthouse in D.C.

-I’ve been interviewed for my work by innumerable media sources — large and small — from Tucker Carlson on Fox News, to reporters with both NBC and the New York Times, to smaller podcasters. I’ve also collaborated on several stories with The Epoch Times, and have been one of a small hand full of journalists who’ve been given access to that “41,000 hours of J6 video” by Speaker McCarthy’s staff. I am just now entering into a “contributor” relationship with Blaze Media.

placeholder

As I said in the beginning, this is an abbreviated overview of my personal “January 6 story.” I have no idea what the government’s renewed interest is in me or my videos. The only “crime” I committed on January 6 — technically speaking — is to have entered a restricted building. But, so did some 80 to 100 other journalists who have not been charged with any crimes. We all simply followed the story where the story went that day.

It would be easy to speculate that I might be being singled out because I haven’t conformed to the “preferred narrative,” or because of the sensitivity of certain stories I’m currently working on. I simply have no idea, so can’t really go there. Not at least until I see the subpoena on Monday, and we can get some questions answered about the status of my case . . . which went from “Your client will be charged within the week” to total silence from the DOJ for more than a year and a half.

Some say there are “no coincidences” in this particular game . . . but we’ll know more on Monday.

Stay tuned . . .

Steve

P.S. I have no idea what they're looking for in my videos. What's so special, that it requires a Grand Jury subpoena? All the good stuff is already posted online:

placeholder

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Tweetstorm Rollout on Secret U.S. Army SpecOps Deployed on January 6
Having no name, this top secret group is referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange”

THREAD: Two and 1/2 years ago, in my 2nd article about #Jan6, (Feb. 24, 2021), I revealed a “very high probability that both [Army] ’Special Forces’ operatives and U.S. Marshalls were mixed in with the crowd that entered the Capitol Building.”

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3842175/who-was-up-the-chain-on-january-6

——

10 months later (Jan. 3, 2022) Newsweek confirmed my sourcing with a story headlined, “Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol.” saying, “The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown.”

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-secret-commandos-shoot-kill-authority-were-capitol-1661330

——

I have quietly investigated this discovery ever since and eventually revealed my knowledge of a SpecOps group deployed on J6 to be a top-secret SIGINT group from Ft. Belvoir, just outside D.C. (I have no info if this is the same group Newsweek reported.)

——

I have long been aware of a current member of this “unit” deployed to the Capitol on J6. Late in 2022, I was introduced to a retired member of the same SpecOps group. In short, he was highly impressed with my knowledge of that unit, as they officially . . . “do not exist.”

——

They may not officially “exist,” but in 2007, British author @MickWSmith revealed the existence and history of this U.S. Army SpecOps group in his book, “Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team”

https://www.amazon.com/Killer-Elite-Completely-Americas-Operations-dp-1250006473/dp/1250006473/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

Unlike the SEALS or Delta Force, this secretive Army team does not have a name. Only their specific operations are given a name, and they are otherwise generally referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange.”

——

My source, who is a retired member of “the unit” does not believe his former group could possibly have been used for any purpose on J6, as it is outside the operational protocols of their mission. Namely, when he was a member, they would never be used for domestic operations.

——

Also, he says they would never have been “seconded” to @FBI. They have a specific chain of command within the Army hierarchy and are only ever seconded to the CIA in overseas ops. That said, he has been retired from “the unit” for almost a decade.

——

In my recent interactions with congressional members and staff, I have been informed that they are aware the “the unit” was operational in some capacity on J6, but have been unable to get answers from @DeptofDefense, specifically because they “do not officially exist.”

——

In recent weeks, trying to get more information, I’ve read another team of special ‘intel’ investigators into my research on this subject. Our most recent discovery is that they have been able to identify another current member of “the unit” who was at the Capitol on J6.

——

Before I go any further in this narrative, I'll emphasize that I've never implied “the unit” was deployed on J6 for nefarious purposes. In my 1st story, I theorized that they were simply there to “take care of business” should protestors get out of hand, using lethal weapons.

——

That established, their presence and deployment raises serious questions. Why are military forces being deployed in violation of posse comitatus law? Is it common practice for @DeptofDefense to allow military SpecOps to be used at domestic protest events?

——

More importantly, if this is not common, and was a one-off operation . . . having “the unit” seconded to @FBI on J6 . . . WHY? What did they know, requiring “the unit's” presence at the Capitol, and what was “the unit’s” “posture” on J6?

——

We are seeking more information, and answers to those questions, but do not expect to receive those directly from @FBI, @CapitolPolice, (if they even knew), or from @DeptofDefense. But, you may be asking why I’m talking about this without having all the facts nailed down.

——

My @FBI whistleblowing friends, @KyleSeraphin and @RealStevefriend have advised me that “daylight” is not only the “best disinfectant,” but also the best “protection” when one is hovering this close over the target. 

——

I don’t have the same covering as that afforded a reliable MSM journalist - as when @FBI had Newsweek’s @warkin release a one-year anniversary CYA story about their deployment of every 3-letter agencies’ tactical teams and military commandos with “shoot to kill” orders on J6.

——

So . . . I’m letting @FBI and @DeptofDefense know that I’ve now read three other friendly journalists, a team of think tank investigators, and several congressional staffers into the details of this story. “Whacking” me, to stop my work, will probably be counterproductive.

——

But, they are welcome to reach out to me and answer my questions. (I also have more.) I’m certain they already have my number. 

Stay tuned. More on this, and even more important J6 stories are in the pipeline. 

——

On Twitter, (or, X):

https://twitter.com/TPC4USA/status/1686907274692861952

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals