Steve Baker - TPC
News • Politics • Writing
Thanks for visiting the TPC Locals community. We're in the fight for Constitutional liberties and small government, for the long haul. We hope you'll join us.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Pragmatic 'Insurrectionist' (Part 1 of Transcript)

For those who still prefer to read!

Due to character limits here on Locals, I usually have to do this in two parts when I transcribe the podcasts. Below is Part 1. (As usual, the video version is on Rumble, and audio can be found on all major podcast platforms. And of course, here on Locals.)


I’ve gotten in trouble for some of my January 6th-related analysis because I won’t immediately accept reporting or narratives which I haven’t see with my own eyes or confirmed from multiple sources. I’ve also been willing to change my opinion of a specific incident when new evidence presents itself, and then, publicly say so. This often leaves me at odds with other journalists on both sides of the prevailing political landscape.

In this article, (or podcast, depending upon whether you’re reading, listening, or watching), I’m going to take you through my thoughts on the Colbert crew case, as well as offer some comments about the new January 6 documentary, “Bloody Hill”, released a few days ago.

First, to set the stage . . .

One particular, very important perspective of mine that has not changed, is my earliest contention that the frontline United States Capitol Police (USCP) officers were used as nothing more than pawns by those who were “up the chain” on January 6th. By those who were orchestrating the flow of the day to establish their desired narrative. I’ve even been very clear that I believe those up the chain were willing to sacrifice Capitol Police officers’ lives for that agenda, had those with more violent intentions showed up with firearms, rather than just sticks, flag poles, and bear spray.

In fact, one NBC News-affiliate investigative reporter — after reading my earliest articles about J6 — asked me, on camera, if I really believed the powers that be, up the chain, were actually willing to sacrifice USCP officers’ lives in order to establish their narrative of an attempted political coup or insurrection. I gave him an unqualified, “Yes.” Even after a year and half spent pouring over reams of new data and hundreds of hours of video evidence, I still believe that to be true. Maybe more so now, than ever.

That’s not to say there weren’t some really bad actors amongst those USCP officers who were battling violent agitators that day, but let’s be perfectly clear . . . the Capitol Police DID NOT “fire the first shot.” That occurred at the initial barricade breach, where the likes of Ray Epps and other unindicted provocateurs violently rushed against the handful of police protecting a ‘bike rack’ fence line — clearly marked as a “Closed Area” — and when USCP officer Caroline Edwards was seriously injured by those very provocateurs. In that initial surge, she was pushed backwards, upended, and knocked unconscious when her head struck the concrete step behind her. The first acts of violence and aggressive provocations did not come from the USCP.

I have always contended that event, itself, was legal justification enough for those officers to have drawn their weapons to protect themselves and the building they were charged to protect. That didn’t happen . . . and I’ve always wanted to know, “Why?” Instead, that group of officers gathered up Ms. Edwards and retreated to the Capitol Building, while the small group of protesters themselves broke in a run toward the building. This, as some in their number began the process of disassembling and carrying away those barricades and hiding the “Area Closed” signs. Even turning them over so as not to be seen by the thousands who would later be coming that way. (All of this is irrefutably documented by multiple video accounts, and will never be shown to the public by the January 6th House Select Committee.)

After the USCP retrenched there on the Capitol’s west terrace, and as larger crowds began to gather behind those who were pressing their defensive line, only then did police begin launching crowd control munitions — flash bang grenades and rubber bullets — into the middle of the more peaceful observers watching what was taking place on the battle line.

That is all a set-up to say this:

The detailed offenses of the Late Show with Stephen Colbert crew— which I’ll not go into, here — did not rise to the level of another so-called “insurrection.” That word, “insurrection” which has been being used by many on our side of the January 6th debate and investigation. As widely reported — even by MSM news agencies — the Colbert group mostly certainly were in violation of multiple, direct orders by USCP to leave the areas where and when they did not have permission for their continued presence . . . whatever their purpose and alleged justification. As such, the USCP issued an appropriate response of their displeasure with the DOJ’s refusal to follow through with charges and prosecution of the “Colbert Nine.” They did in fact break the law after ignoring multiple orders to vacate the premises.

By contrast, the vast majority of the peaceful protestors who entered the Capitol Building — after the USPC and DC Metro police were ordered to stand down, and the violent perpetrators had breached the building through broken windows — received no such instructions from law enforcement. In fact — as we are aware, and is factually indisputable — most of those protestors and rally attendees met no resistance or “DO NOT ENTER” warnings from police as they approached the opened doors of the Capitol.

My own personal experience is instructive. I entered the open northwest Capitol Building door at about 2:19 P.M., only a few minutes after that breach, but I didn’t not witness either the breach, itself. I first observed several dozen police officers standing aside, chatting amongst themselves or talking on their cellphones. None were issuing orders to the crowd to stay out. None were offering any resistance. The door had clearly been opened from the inside, and I had no knowledge that it had been illegally and violently breached. (It was not until later analysis of my own video that I saw the window of that door had been shattered, as I was in the moment only concentrating on capturing the ongoing events with my camera.) At least a hundred others similarly passed through that door, unimpeded and without warning, before I walked through. There was no possible way to make any other assumption than that the Capitol had — for whatever reason — been opened to the crowd for entrance. Especially given the ‘stand down’ posture then presented by the police officers who were in the area.

Less than 45 minutes later, while in the lower level of the south side of the building, a female officer took me by my arm and politely said to me, “Sir, may I safely escort you out of the building?” I responded in complete compliance, with no resistance to her request.

The Colbert crew did exactly the opposite, and that is the reason for which they should be prosecuted. To not prosecute them for their defiant behavior is a clear double-standard by the DOJ, as compared to the largest number of people who have been charged and prosecuted for unknowingly “trespassing” or “entering a restricted space.”

The exaggerated use of the word “insurrection,” applied to the Colbert crew and thrown around by certain of those on our side of this debate, does nothing to help our cause. Frankly, it diminishes our efforts, when much more logical and reasonable arguments can be made in pointing out the egregious double standards and selective prosecutions being made by the DOJ in most J6 cases.

Along the same lines . . . and I’m certainly going to offend some with my continued remarks . . . yesterday, I watched the new documentary put out by StopHate.com, entitled, “Bloody Hill.” Frankly, I’m not impressed and especially disconcerted by several of the “facts” and assertions they present in the documentary.

First of all, several times they make the claim that “two million” or “millions” of people had gathered in D.C. that day for the rally. That is a gross exaggeration of the crowd size. My personal estimation, which I devoted a 22-minute video in describing, was a crowd of between 400,000 to 600,000. I came to that estimate using known formulas, supplied by military sources, for estimating the number of people assembled on the published acreage of both The Ellipse and Washington Monument lawns. As more data and reliable information has emerged — especially regarding the much smaller area of The Ellipse actually used, and the limits placed on the crowd size allowed into that specific area, I’ve since downgraded my estimate of the overall attendance at the rally to between 250,000 and 400,000. Certainly no more than half a million. Still, not a shabby number considering this event took place on a midweek work day for most in attendance. No exaggeration of “millions,” is necessary.

Secondly, the documentary producers claim that some “10,000” persons had already gathered at the barricade where the first breach occurred. This is another gross exaggeration.

I arrived at that location less than 20 minutes later, and while there were, in fact, already thousands of protestors leaving in the middle of Trump’s ‘nothing burger’ speech — all making their way to the Capitol Building for the announced march and continuation of scheduled speeches by lower-tier dignataries — there were only a few hundred who had by that time arrived. In fact, when I first started filming the violence on the west terrace — at 1:19 P.M. — there were only a couple hundred people present. Most of those simply observing the ‘action’ already taking place by the few dozen who were actively pressing against the police line and assaulting the thin line of USCP officers. Over the course of the next hour, the crowd did grow to rather epic proportions. Many hundreds on the terrace itself, and tens-of-thousands gathered below. (I was completely unaware of what was taking place on the east side of the building.)

The “Bloody Hill” documentary continues, for most of its duration, essentially painting the entirety of the USCP as nothing short of murderous thugs. That is not my experience, and certainly not what I captured on video. I observed dozens of police officers getting the utter shit kicked out of them by violent assaults from many of those agitators. As I’ve reported numerous times, what I observed over the course of my hour videoing what was taking place on the west terrace, eventually elicited my number one question about January 6th. WHO ordered the Capitol police to NOT use more aggressive defense measures in protecting themselves, the Capitol, and its occupants? Based on my own observations, I saw many acts of potentially deadly force used against police officers that should have warranted a response using their own, far more deadly, and decisively crowd-stopping weapons.

My conclusion has always been that they were ordered not to respond with appropriate measure — as a group — and I have since continued in my amazement by the constraint those police officers individually displayed during certain of those attacks they endured.

That said, there were most definitely examples where individual police officers did aggressively and unnecessarily respond, even beating certain protestors, unnecessarily. One lady — as covered in “Bloody Hill” — was later beaten to death by an officer during the west tunnel violence. Two other men most certainly suffered their deaths as a result ofthe flash bang grenades launched over the heads of the violent perpetrators, into the crowd of peaceful observers. I too was hit in the leg by one of those grenades, and for weeks had the bruises to show for it. As I was not engaged in any violent behavior, and in that moment was not among the perpetrators of violence or attempted breach of that police line, I should not have been the target of that weapon.

To be continued . . .

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
When Dems speak to me with their outside voice

Dem poll greeter in Western NC expresses her frustrations with FEMA to me and then says, “I’m kinda discouraged to see the number of Latinos and young people that are voting for the Republicans.”

Enjoy!

00:02:02
Friday morning!

In-depth and, at times, explosive interview with @KyleSeraphin drops on @BlazeTV and http://youtube.com/@BlazeNewsTonight tomorrow morning.

00:01:59
Why doesn't the Secret Service record their radio comms?
00:01:07
TNN Live This Morning

This was an interesting - and primarily non-J6-related - discussion with Dan Newman this morning. We spent quite a bit of time discussing this new "weaponization of rape as a tool of war" in the Hamas/Israel conflict. We also cover a couple of other things, including a teaser of something else I'm going to be looking at in my upcoming visit to the Capitol CCTV viewing room.

TNN Live This Morning
TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman

Dan and I spent quite a bit of time today discussing the coming 'Big Story," as well as the recent Stephen Horn case and conviction.

TNN Live Today, w/ Dan Newman
This Morning on TNN Live!

If you haven't noticed, this is a pretty big news day, and Dan and I get into a lot of it. Definitely worth a listen. I especially express my frustrations with the do-nothing GOP, when so much CAN be done right now, about so MUCH that is going on.

This Morning on TNN Live!

It's Friday.., and it's not cynical...

This one struck a chord with me. I am a widower who was married for 40 years to one woman. We had two daughters, both married to their only husbands. I never did the extramarital thing.

I also have a pair of younger brothers, the youngest married to one woman for 35 years, with a married daughter and a not-yet-married son. The brother in the middle is on his 5th wife and his son and daughter have different mothers. Not trying to sport any kind of attitude.., I love them all. My point is that I can see both sides of this argument.

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/elons-baby-mama-drama-exposes-the-rights-pro-family-hypocrisy

post photo preview
Bull City Syndicate - 23 Years, and Done
New beginnings and the end of an era as I retire my bands

On December 8, 2023, Bull City Syndicate (BCS) played its final show. We went out with a bang, performing a top-shelf corporate holiday event to 700 enthusiastic attendees. Appropriately, in the city of the band’s birth — Durham, NC — The Bull City. I considered booking a final public show, but after much thought, I decided to retire the band in a more low-key, less public manner. 

In November of 2000, I answered an ad from an established local band then known as Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns. (SK) I’d spent a year getting my trumpet chops back into shape after a decade in the music business, managing other artists. I did not intend to do anything in SK other than return to my first love: just playing the trumpet. I didn’t want to manage the band and certainly had no interest in ownership. I just wanted to play again. Money didn’t matter. And in those days, even as one of the premier club bands in the Raleigh/Durham market, my share of earnings from a 9-piece horn band rarely covered my bar tab.

For many months after joining Soul Kitchen, I managed to avoid being involved in the business of the band. When asked by band members what I did for a living, I always lied and gave them a different story each time. (I remember once telling them I was in the CIA. Ha!) Finally, after a Sunday night rehearsal, drinking and smoking on the back deck of our original drummer’s house (Dave Wilkins), Dave suddenly demanded, “Baker. What the f—k do you do for a living?”

“You really want to know?”

“Yes!”

“I manage bands for a living.”

“WHAT!? Why don’t you manage this band?”

“I don’t want to. I just want to play trumpet.”

At the next week’s rehearsal, Dave handed me a manilla folder that represented the totality of the band’s “business.”

“You’re in charge now,” said Dave. 

(Sigh.)

Bull City Syndicate opening for Eddie Money in 2008

From that point forward, things began to change quickly for SK. First began a radical updating of our set list designed to draw more people to our shows and more dollars for the band. I began to pursue more private events and larger public shows. Some of the original band members were not happy about the extra demands and work required to make the move from a fun club band to a serious special event band, and we began to replace members. With the band growing in popularity, we were able to attract even more versatile and better-trained musicians. We went from being a really good band to a great "horn band," packing out every live performance and fielding requests for those higher-paying private events.

We then began to spin off a few side projects. The first of those was our pop-jazz 4-piece called Cafe Mars. Then, in 2006, we launched an aggressive recording project led by award-winning local producer John Custer. After six months in the studio, “You Make Me Feel” was released in 2007. An album paying tribute to North Carolina songwriters, and for which I’m really proud of the final product. Especially the original tunes written for the album by Custer himself. It was because of that album that Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns became Bull City Syndicate. (There were 17 other bands named Soul Kitchen at the time, and with an album containing original music, we didn’t want to deal with any trademark issues.)

Durham Herald Sun Magazine feature in 2008

When the economy began to tank in the summer of 2008 and into 2009, so many local music venues didn’t survive or cut their live music budgets drastically, and private event buyers were forced to hire smaller bands and DJs. Bull City Syndicate made the decision to add a female lead singer to the line-up — as that was a requirement of so many private event and wedding buyers. Our 9-piece “all dude” band became a 10-piece outfit, and the additional female lead remained a feature of the band for its remaining years.

Anyone managing a 10-piece band knows that turnover is going to happen — even when there’s no drama or interpersonal issues. People move away, change jobs, etc. Life happens. But, somewhere around 2010, there was a particular tumult that caused five of our members to leave, and suddenly, with no remaining original members, Bull City Syndicate became “my” band. We were able to fill the missing spots quickly, and the band really took off. No longer led by a “committee,” I was able to take the band to the next level, particularly as a private event and festival band.

Bull City Syndicate Christmas show in Raleigh, NC - 2016

There were many highlights through my time with both incarnations of the band: SK and BCS. My very first gig with SK was an opening date for Kool & The Gang. Our last such brush with greatness was when Dolly Parton joined us onstage performing her classic hit, “Jolene.”

We were honored to be the headlining entertainment for the last two NC Governor’s Inaugural Balls. We performed for some of the largest companies and charities in America: SAS, Glaxo, AT&T, American Heart Association, and too many others to list. We traveled throughout the Mid-Atlantic region for shows — as far north as Maryland and even down to Florida.

Our first spin-off, Cafe Mars, eventually became a 6-piece version of the band called BCS Express. Then, 10 years ago, we added a “yacht rock” version of the band called Captain & The Keels. (C&K) The same line-up as BCS, doing the smooth rock hits from ’75 to ’85, with appropriate foolish costumes.

Captain & The Keels in Hampton, VA - 2016

In 2018 came my most fun spin-off. A David Bowie Tribute act called The American Bowie Experience. (ABX) With that group, we moved our bassist, Randy Ines, over to keys (because of his virtuoso piano chops), and brought my son Duncan in on bass guitar. (Bowie’s son is also named Duncan. Just a coincidence.) Despite the growing popularity and demand for ABX, that band didn’t survive the COVID-19 pandemic after a year and a half of lockdowns. It was everything I could do just to get BCS back to work.

American Bowie Experience at House of Blues in Myrtle Beach, SC - 2019

The aftermath of the pandemic was the beginning of the end for BCS. My life began to change drastically. For more than 25 years I’d been a hobbyist political writer and commentator. My writing chops began to take shape in the early days of the Internet. AOL, Compuserve, and Prodigy eventually became MySpace. MySpace became Facebook, where my online following really began to take off. 

In early 2020 — long after the four versions of the band had become my full-time job and main source of income — “Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve” became two months of COVID lockdowns, and none of the band projects were allowed to do live performances. It was then that I decided to monetize my writing “hobby,” moving that to the captain’s seat of my endeavors and BCS and its spinoffs to the co-pilot’s seat. By 2022 and into 2023, my journalistic efforts were being rewarded with significant media attention, and my travels were keeping me away from the band and its needs with increasing frequency. 

In the summer of 2023, I was approached by Dallas-based Blaze Media to become a contributing writer. I was now splitting most of my time between D.C. and Dallas, and the bands’ bookings were suffering. With that came the hard decision that ultimately led me to retire from the BCS and C&K brands, make the total life transition and reinvention to a full-time writer and investigative journalist for The Blaze.

An appearance on The Glenn Beck Show in 2023

I’ve been doing music in one form or the other for over 50 years. At 19 years old, I was traveling the world playing trumpet. In the 80s, I was working for churches doing music and promoting contemporary Christian music concerts with the biggest names in that industry. Into the 90s, I became manager to national acts touring around the world — which caused me to put my horns in the closet for about 10 years. By 1999, I just wanted to play music again, and I answered that ad to join Soul Kitchen & The Bull City Horns.

Obviously, this telling is the very short version of that 23-year experience, and what became such a significant part of my life. There were hard times and bad times, but mostly wonderful times with all the guys and gals I was honored to perform with. We played for near-empty rooms and for as many as 40,000 at festivals. We shared the stage with famous artists and many of the best local musicians and bands. I will always cherish every moment.

BCS Express in Cary, NC - 2013

I want to express my heartfelt thanks and admiration to all the fantastic musicians who made those 23 years unforgettable. And to the fans who continued to show up for our infrequent club shows in the last couple of years. Many who’d been coming to see us for over 20 years!

At our final Durham show on December 8, I stepped off the stage a few times just to watch and soak it in. After the last song, and when we began the final tear-down and load-out of the gear, one of the guys said to me, “You know you’re going to miss this.”

Yes . . . I am.

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Brief Summary of My Personal January 6 Story Timeline (Then ’til Now)
Mainly For Newer Followers, Not Yet Up-to-Speed on My Work

A more detailed account of my day on January 6, 2021, can be found here:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc


 

-On Dec. 21, 2020 — two days after Trump announced his own "wild" J6 rally at The Ellipse in D.C. — I posted this announcement to my social media accounts:

“Regardless of how you feel about the election results, this might be a spectacle worth observing up close and personal. (I'm predisposed to believe this crowd will not riot, loot, and burn the city.) I might begin my northeast run on this date, in DC. Anyone else going? #tpcroadtrip2021”

Well . . . they didn't "burn the city."

——

-In my email newsletter that went out on January 4, 2021, I made the following comment:

“I am headed to DC on Wednesday. Why? Not because I think a crowd of any size is going to force government into a real investigation of the election results, but because the “powers that be” on all sides of the political equation need to see WE THE PEOPLE in force, letting them know that WE ARE WATCHING. WE are engaged! WE are not going to lay down to any level of tyranny — whether it comes from the right or the left, the Democrats or the GOP. I’m also hoping to document on video anything “special” that might happen, and perhaps get a few interviews from a variety of voices.”

-By “special” . . . it was rumored there would be some big announcement on the election controversy, (a release of The Kraken, maybe), about which I hoped to get comments from members of the crowd. There was nothing special announced from the stage, by Trump or any of the others. The “special” came later . . . unexpectedly.

——

-I arrived at the Washington Monument at about 9:30 am on January 6, and spent the next three hours watching the crowd grow to an enormous size — documenting it on video.

-Trump took the stage almost an hour later than announced, at 11:57 pm. His “warm-up” acts were ‘meh,’ and his speech was equally ‘meh.’ Because of the cold, windy conditions, the poor audio, and wanting to get ahead of the throng that was scheduled to march on the Capitol for the other events, I left the Washington Monument lawn about halfway through Trump’s speech and began a brisk walk toward the Capitol Building . . . along with thousands of others already peeling off from Trump's speech.

-I arrived at the Reflection Pool on the west side of the Capitol at about 1:15 pm, where I was hearing police sirens and what sounded like explosions. From there, I could see smoke and the arrival of DC Metro PD (MPD) units pouring down the steps toward the west terrace. I made the decision to sprint up to the terrace, where I turned on my camera at 1:19 pm, and for almost an hour filmed the violence and surging crowds in that area.

-Just after 2:00 pm I began to notice signs of Capitol Police (USCP) withdrawal. Shortly thereafter, there was a sudden surge of protestors up the stairs underneath the scaffolding on the northwest side of the terrace. Hundreds of protestors were now in unrestricted movement up those stairs, so I followed.

-At approximately 2:21 pm I followed hundreds of protestors through what some call the “Senate Wing door.” This, I would later learn, was the site of the first breach of the building. I did not see the breach, as it occurred at approximately 2:13 pm, while I was still on the lower terrace.

-For almost 40 minutes I captured scenes inside the Capitol Building, before exiting at about 2:59 pm, at the exact location where FBI tactical unit medics were trying to save Ashli Babbit’s life. Just over one minute after I exited through the South door, I filmed Babbitt’s extraction through that doorway, while the D.C. Fire EMT crew still worked feverishly on her lifeless body.

Screenshot from my video - January 6, 2021 - of Ashli Babbitt being evacuated from
the Capitol Building by D.C. Fire Department emergency medical techs.

-Shortly thereafter, I gave a couple of interviews to local media, found a restroom and a sandwich, then returned to the Capitol to witness the arrival of the Army and Air Force National Guards finalize the clearing of the entire Capitol grounds. I then returned to my hotel in Arlington sometime after 7:30 pm.

——

-For the next five days I began frame by frame review of my videos, and then started writing my first story about the event, which was posted on January 13, 2021:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-On February 24, 2021, I published my second story about J6:

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3897816/what-i-saw-on-january-6th-in-washington-dc

-As I’ve pointed out many times, I got a few things wrong in my earliest analyses. I’ve tried to correct those over the following months and years as new evidence has presented itself. But, those two articles remain as written — errors included.

——

-Because I engaged in no violence, property damage, chanting, singing, carried no flags, and wore no political messages on my clothing . . . as the months wore on I began to think maybe I was going to have the same respect as so many other journalists who were not being rounded up in the J6 dragnet. But, on the morning of July 22, 2021, I received a phone call from FBI Special Agent Gerrit Doss. After he asked me for a voluntary interview, I immediately turned that over to my local attorney, and they worked together with all our schedules to arrange a date for the interview.

-The first attempt at scheduling the FBI interview was aborted on-site, on the morning of August 5, 2021. The reason given — after my attorney and I had already arrived at their Cary, NC filed office — was that they could not interview me, “because of my press status,” until after they received a letter of approval from the U.S. Attorney General’s office.

-My attorney worked with an assistant USAG, they negotiated a proffer agreement for the interview, and it was rescheduled for October 18, 2021. I was interviewed for two full hours, under the agreement that nothing I said in the interview could be used against me — should charges be made against me — in court . . . unless I perjured myself. (That didn’t happen.)

-On November 17, 2021, my attorney received an email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Anita Eve — out of Philadelphia — stating, “Your client will be charged within the week.”

-On Monday morning of Thanksgiving week — November 22, 2021 — we sent out approximately 200 press releases to all manner of media sources, stating that I — an independent journalist — was about to be prosecuted for nothing more than the act of “journalism” on January 6.

-At approximately 1:00 pm that same day, AUSA Eve sent my attorney a copy of that press release, stating, “We’re not happy about this.” He responded, asking, “Are you saying my client should forego his 1st Amendment right because he is being persecuted by the federal government?" There were a couple of other exchanges between my attorney and the AUSA before she went silent. I assumed that was because of the Thanksgiving holiday.

-My phone began to ring from interested media sources, wishing to cover my story.

-On Tuesday evening — November 23 — I received a call from Senator Ron Johnson (WI), asking me how he could help. As the minority leader of a Senate J6 investigative committee, he put me in touch with his investigators.

-On Wednesday morning — November 24 — I was contacted by an attorney who practices criminal law in D.C., who happened to be a federal prosecutor for more than 20 years. After a three-hour phone call, I engaged his services.

-On Monday — November 29 — my new attorney reached out to AUSA Eve by both email and phone, and she never responded. We never heard from her or the FBI again . . . until yesterday — August 5, 2023 — more than 20 months later, when my Raleigh attorney received a call from the FBI notifying him that they had “service of process” for me.

-This turns out to be a Grand Jury subpoena, requesting my January 6 videos. My attorney received that on Monday. We have been able to determine the DOJ has reopened its investigation into my January 6 activities. I volunteered to give those to the FBI during my interview in October of ’21, but they never followed up and requested them. The most unfortunate fact is . . . grand juries are not convened to investigate misdemeanor crimes. For unknown reasons, they are apparently considering a felony recommendation to the grand jury. As of this writing, that is all we know.

——

-Since January 6, 2021, as well as the time since my threatened prosecution, I have been very active in investigating many aspects related to January 6. Something I never expected to be engaged in. I have broken original stories, developed Capitol Police whistleblowers, met with Congress Members, and engaged with congressional staffers and investigators. All of that has been well documented in my blogs.

-In the fall of 2022, I covered every day of the first, nine-week-long Oath Keepers trial, at the District Courthouse in D.C.

-I’ve been interviewed for my work by innumerable media sources — large and small — from Tucker Carlson on Fox News, to reporters with both NBC and the New York Times, to smaller podcasters. I’ve also collaborated on several stories with The Epoch Times, and have been one of a small hand full of journalists who’ve been given access to that “41,000 hours of J6 video” by Speaker McCarthy’s staff. I am just now entering into a “contributor” relationship with Blaze Media.

placeholder

As I said in the beginning, this is an abbreviated overview of my personal “January 6 story.” I have no idea what the government’s renewed interest is in me or my videos. The only “crime” I committed on January 6 — technically speaking — is to have entered a restricted building. But, so did some 80 to 100 other journalists who have not been charged with any crimes. We all simply followed the story where the story went that day.

It would be easy to speculate that I might be being singled out because I haven’t conformed to the “preferred narrative,” or because of the sensitivity of certain stories I’m currently working on. I simply have no idea, so can’t really go there. Not at least until I see the subpoena on Monday, and we can get some questions answered about the status of my case . . . which went from “Your client will be charged within the week” to total silence from the DOJ for more than a year and a half.

Some say there are “no coincidences” in this particular game . . . but we’ll know more on Monday.

Stay tuned . . .

Steve

P.S. I have no idea what they're looking for in my videos. What's so special, that it requires a Grand Jury subpoena? All the good stuff is already posted online:

placeholder

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Tweetstorm Rollout on Secret U.S. Army SpecOps Deployed on January 6
Having no name, this top secret group is referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange”

THREAD: Two and 1/2 years ago, in my 2nd article about #Jan6, (Feb. 24, 2021), I revealed a “very high probability that both [Army] ’Special Forces’ operatives and U.S. Marshalls were mixed in with the crowd that entered the Capitol Building.”

https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3842175/who-was-up-the-chain-on-january-6

——

10 months later (Jan. 3, 2022) Newsweek confirmed my sourcing with a story headlined, “Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol.” saying, “The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown.”

https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-secret-commandos-shoot-kill-authority-were-capitol-1661330

——

I have quietly investigated this discovery ever since and eventually revealed my knowledge of a SpecOps group deployed on J6 to be a top-secret SIGINT group from Ft. Belvoir, just outside D.C. (I have no info if this is the same group Newsweek reported.)

——

I have long been aware of a current member of this “unit” deployed to the Capitol on J6. Late in 2022, I was introduced to a retired member of the same SpecOps group. In short, he was highly impressed with my knowledge of that unit, as they officially . . . “do not exist.”

——

They may not officially “exist,” but in 2007, British author @MickWSmith revealed the existence and history of this U.S. Army SpecOps group in his book, “Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team”

https://www.amazon.com/Killer-Elite-Completely-Americas-Operations-dp-1250006473/dp/1250006473/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

Unlike the SEALS or Delta Force, this secretive Army team does not have a name. Only their specific operations are given a name, and they are otherwise generally referred to as “the activity,” “the unit,” or “orange.”

——

My source, who is a retired member of “the unit” does not believe his former group could possibly have been used for any purpose on J6, as it is outside the operational protocols of their mission. Namely, when he was a member, they would never be used for domestic operations.

——

Also, he says they would never have been “seconded” to @FBI. They have a specific chain of command within the Army hierarchy and are only ever seconded to the CIA in overseas ops. That said, he has been retired from “the unit” for almost a decade.

——

In my recent interactions with congressional members and staff, I have been informed that they are aware the “the unit” was operational in some capacity on J6, but have been unable to get answers from @DeptofDefense, specifically because they “do not officially exist.”

——

In recent weeks, trying to get more information, I’ve read another team of special ‘intel’ investigators into my research on this subject. Our most recent discovery is that they have been able to identify another current member of “the unit” who was at the Capitol on J6.

——

Before I go any further in this narrative, I'll emphasize that I've never implied “the unit” was deployed on J6 for nefarious purposes. In my 1st story, I theorized that they were simply there to “take care of business” should protestors get out of hand, using lethal weapons.

——

That established, their presence and deployment raises serious questions. Why are military forces being deployed in violation of posse comitatus law? Is it common practice for @DeptofDefense to allow military SpecOps to be used at domestic protest events?

——

More importantly, if this is not common, and was a one-off operation . . . having “the unit” seconded to @FBI on J6 . . . WHY? What did they know, requiring “the unit's” presence at the Capitol, and what was “the unit’s” “posture” on J6?

——

We are seeking more information, and answers to those questions, but do not expect to receive those directly from @FBI, @CapitolPolice, (if they even knew), or from @DeptofDefense. But, you may be asking why I’m talking about this without having all the facts nailed down.

——

My @FBI whistleblowing friends, @KyleSeraphin and @RealStevefriend have advised me that “daylight” is not only the “best disinfectant,” but also the best “protection” when one is hovering this close over the target. 

——

I don’t have the same covering as that afforded a reliable MSM journalist - as when @FBI had Newsweek’s @warkin release a one-year anniversary CYA story about their deployment of every 3-letter agencies’ tactical teams and military commandos with “shoot to kill” orders on J6.

——

So . . . I’m letting @FBI and @DeptofDefense know that I’ve now read three other friendly journalists, a team of think tank investigators, and several congressional staffers into the details of this story. “Whacking” me, to stop my work, will probably be counterproductive.

——

But, they are welcome to reach out to me and answer my questions. (I also have more.) I’m certain they already have my number. 

Stay tuned. More on this, and even more important J6 stories are in the pipeline. 

——

On Twitter, (or, X):

https://twitter.com/TPC4USA/status/1686907274692861952

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals