data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d279/5d279e44ea77d37c1246ed0bcf5ae81a18adcbd3" alt="post photo preview"
Today's the day. We thought it would be as early as last Wednesday, but then came the surprise testimony of co-defendant Jessica Watkins, along with a couple other delays. Brad Geyer's closing summation will be the first thing the jury hears this morning. Then, the closings for Thomas Caldwell and Watkins. After, the government will be allowed their rebuttal arguments for the five defendant's closings, and then the jury will be handed the case. They will begin deliberations either late this afternoon or tomorrow morning.
This is week eight - or nine, counting jury selection. I hate to say that the defense lawyers have been strategically setting for appeals, but . . . it is a DC jury. Miracles happen in this courthouse only about 3% of the time.
Below is Brad Geyer's closing argument. He will certainly do some ad libbing, and there will also be some video presentations to accompany the narrative. It's not as eloquent as the opening statement for Ken Harrelson. This one is more of a club. It's a brute force attack against the many mischaracterizations the government has made against Ken and the other four defendants. He will either reach the logical mind of a reasonable juror or two, or the government will come back in retribution come sentencing time. That's the gambit.
As supporting subscribers to this Locals community . . . you get to see the whole thing.
-----
May it please The Court . . .
Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury . . .
Once again, my name is Bradford Geyer. I’m honored to stand before you today to declare Kenny Harrelson’s innocence of these charges brought against him.
I first became attracted to Kenny’s case because of one primary thing:
The charges against him, and the very first video evidence of those charges - as presented by the Government - were in direct contradiction to one another. When I saw this contradiction of truth and reality, my first question was:
“Am I looking at simple carelessness on behalf of the government, or is this an indifference to the truth?”
That was 14 months ago . . . and here I now proudly stand before you with the truth in hand.
Not my truth . . . Not Kenny’s truth . . . But the actual truth as presented in this trial, by the GOVERNMENT ITSELF.
I mean . . . think about it . . .
Charging these defendants with damage and destruction to doors that were first opened before they ever arrived - then opened again with 75-100 people passing through before they ever reached those doors . . .
Doors that were being broken - and panes shattered - BEFORE these defendants arrived . . .
Doors opened from the INSIDE . . . doors no Oath Keeper ever touched, or pulled upon, or pushed open.
These are facts, contained in irrefutable video evidence . . . as presented by the Government . . . and it’s these SMALLER fallacies - accusations of crimes not even committed - that makes everything else they’ve presented to be fair game and called into question.
And, there’s more . . . a LOT more.
——